DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK: ICO slams Carphone Warehouse with £400,000 penalty; inadequate security contributed to 2015 hack

Posted on January 10, 2018 by Dissent

If you’ve been following along since 2015, you may recall a breach involving Carphone Warehouse that was first disclosed in August, 2015. At the time, we were told that the hack affected 2.4 million customers’ data and about 90,000 customers’ credit cards.

Fast forward to today, when the U.K.’s Information Commissioner announced that it has imposed one of its largest fines ever for a data protection failure – £400,000 (USD $540,704.66).  And according to the ICO,

The company’s failure to secure the system allowed unauthorised access to the personal data of over three million customers and 1,000 employees.

The compromised customer data included: names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, marital status and, for more than 18,000 customers, historical payment card details.

The records for some Carphone Warehouse employees, including name, phone numbers, postcode, and car registration were also accessed.

Similar to the type of analysis done by the Federal Trade Commission in the U.S., the ICO fined CW after identifying multiple inadequacies in Carphone Warehouse’s approach to data security and determining that the company had failed to take adequate steps to protect the personal information.  Unlike the FTC, however the ICO has the authority to impose monetary penalties for failures to provide adequate data security. The FTC may only impose monetary penalties for breaches if the breach is not the first breach and occurred because a previous corrective action plan was not adhered to.

And once again we see that in the UK, entities can suffer consequences even if there is no evidence of misuse of data or other tangible/financial harms from an incident. That issue of harm continues to be a stumbling block in U.S. litigation, with Daniel Solve and Danielle Citron arguing in an upcomingTexas Law Review article, Risk and Anxiety: A Theory of Data Breach Harms , that the issue of harm needs a serious rethinking because U.S. courts are too quick to conclude that data breaches don’t create harm.

You can access the ICO’s monetary penalty notice in the Carphone Warehouse case here (pdf).

 

Related posts:

  • Carphone Warehouse coughs to MEGA data breach hitting up to 2.4 MEELLION customers (Update2)
  • NY Attorney General James Secures $300,000 from Online Sporting Goods Retailers for Failing to Protect Consumers’ Personal Information
  • UK: Welcome Financial Services Limited Fined £150,000 After Backup Tapes With Customer Contact Info Lost
  • UK: DSG Retail Ltd fined £500,000 for failing to secure information of at least 14 million people
Category: Business SectorHackNon-U.S.Of Note

Post navigation

← Dog-Walking App Exposed Home Addresses and Lockbox Codes
Sask. Health Authority sends more private health info to computer shop, says frustrated owner →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.