DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Malware incident discovered in May, 2017 affected 2,600 patients: Partners HealthCare System

Posted on February 5, 2018 by Dissent

Partners HealthCare System, whose hospitals include Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s, revealed today that it had discovered a malware attack in May, 2017 that may have exposed 2,600 patients’ information. They learned of the problem on May 8, but because data was mixed in with code, numbers, other data, and unformatted, it took them quite a while to figure out who was impacted and who needed to be notified.

The statement on their web site begins:

On May 8, 2017, Partners HealthCare System, Inc. (“Partners”) became aware that our computer network had been affected by a sophisticated, malicious computer program introduced by an unauthorized third party.  Our monitoring systems identified suspicious activity, and we immediately blocked some of this malware and began an investigation working with third party forensic consultants to identify the problem and mitigate its impact.

We were able to determine that the malware was not specifically targeted to impact the Partners environment, Partners operations or any information maintained by Partners.  We also confirmed that there was no access to our electronic medical record system.  As we continued the investigation, however, we became aware that the malware may have resulted in unauthorized access to certain data resulting from user activity on affected computers from May 8, 2017 to May 17, 2017.  As impacted computers were identified, Partners implemented aggressive containment measures to mitigate further impact.

As part of our ongoing review, we became aware on July 11, 2017 of data that appeared to possibly involve personal and health information.  The impacted data was not in any specific format, and it was mixed in together with computer code, dates, numbers and other data, making it very difficult to read or decipher.  After an extensive manual data analysis completed in December 2017, we are notifying individuals whose personal and health information may have been involved, in an abundance of caution.  Based on the review, the information involved may have included certain types of protected health information for patients, including first and last name, date(s) of service, and/or certain limited amounts of clinical information such as procedure type, diagnosis, and/or medication. For some patients, Social Security Numbers and financial account data may have been involved.   However, we are currently not aware of any misuse of patients’ health information.  

Read more of their statement on their site.

h/t  Boston Business Journal


Related:

  • Clorox Files $380M Suit Alleging Cognizant Gave Hackers Passwords in Catastrophic 2023 Cyberattack
  • #StopRansomware: Interlock
  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • British institutions to be banned from paying ransoms to Russian hackers
  • Data breach feared after cyberattack on AMEOS hospitals in Germany
  • Michigan ‘ATM jackpotting’: Florida men allegedly forced machines to dispense $107K
Category: Health DataMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← 12 UNC employees’ personal information comprised in cybersecurity breach
Man sues T-Mobile for allegedly failing to stop hackers from draining his cryptocurrency account →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Scattered Spider is running a VMware ESXi hacking spree
  • BreachForums — the one that went offline in April — reappears with a new founder/owner
  • Fans React After NASCAR Confirms Ransomware Breach
  • Allianz Life says ‘majority’ of customers’ personal data stolen in cyberattack (1)
  • Infinite Services notifying employees and patients of limited ransomware attack
  • The safe place for women to talk wasn’t so safe: hackers leak 13,000 user photos and IDs from the Tea app
  • Au: Qantas hackers gave airline 72-hour deadline
  • Honeywell vulnerability exposes building systems to cyber attacks
  • Recent public service announcements of note — parents should take special note of these
  • Au: Junior doctor faces fresh toilet spying charges as probe widens to other major hospitals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Microsoft’s controversial Recall feature is now blocked by Brave and AdGuard
  • Trump Administration Issues AI Action Plan and Series of AI Executive Orders
  • Indonesia asked to reassess data privacy terms in new U.S. trade deal
  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure
  • Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report