DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

There’s a big problem for the FTC lurking in 11th Circuit’s LabMD data-security ruling

Posted on June 8, 2018 by Dissent

Alison Frankel writes about what she calls the less obvious takeaway from the 11th Circuit’s LabMD opinion:

FTC enforcement actions for unfair practices cannot be based just on consumer injury, even “substantial” injury.

This is going to get wonky, but, trust me, it’s what cybersecurity defense lawyers are already buzzing about.

Read more on Reuters.  And yes, that aspect of the ruling did not go unnoticed or uncommented upon on Twitter when the opinion was released. Consider, for example, this footnote from the opinion:

24 Section 5(n) now states, with regard to public policy, “In determining whether an act or practice is unfair, the Commission may consider established public policies as evidence to be considered with all other evidence. Such public policy considerations may not serve as a primary basis for such determination.” We do not take this ambiguous statement to mean that the Commission may bring suit purely on the basis of substantial consumer injury. The act or practice alleged to have caused the injury must still be unfair under a well-established legal standard, whether grounded in statute, the common law, or the Constitution.

So there’s a lot to discuss about this opinion, and I think this point is going to pose a major hurdle for the FTC going forward in data security cases. Where are they going to find statutory, common law, or constitutional bases for declaring specific acts or practices “unfair?”   Will they start engaging in rule- or regulation-writing?  I am guessing, based on their history of enforcement, that they will turn to common law, but I look forward to reading what  scholars and litigators think.

 

Related posts:

  • FTC v. LabMD: A bad case and a questionable decision, but the right outcome
  • FTC Announces Hearings On Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century
  • FTC Takes Action Against Drizly and its CEO James Cory Rellas for Security Failures that Exposed Data of 2.5 Million Consumers
  • FTC v. LabMD ruling issued: FTC loses data security enforcement case (Update2)
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesOf Note

Post navigation

← UK: Bible Society fined £100,000 by ICO after security failings put 417,000 supporters’ personal data at risk
New York State suspends ex-URMC nurse who shared patient info with her new employer →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.