DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK: Six month prison sentence for motor industry employee in first ICO Computer Misuse Act prosecution

Posted on November 12, 2018 by Dissent

From the Information Commissioner’s Office:

A motor industry employee has been sentenced to six months in prison in the first prosecution to be brought by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) under legislation which carries a potential prison sentence.

Mustafa Kasim, who worked for accident repair firm Nationwide Accident Repair Services (NARS), accessed thousands of  customer records containing personal data without permission, using his colleagues’ log-in details to access a software system that estimates the cost of vehicle repairs, known as Audatex.

He continued to do this after he started a new job at a different car repair organisation which used the same software system.  The records contained customers’ names, phone numbers, vehicle and accident information.

NARS contacted the ICO when they saw an increase in customer complaints about nuisance calls and assisted the ICO with their investigation.

The ICO usually prosecutes cases like this under the Data Protection Act 1998 or 2018, depending on the individual case.  However,  in appropriate cases, it can prosecute under other legislation – in this case s.1 of the Computer Misuse Act 1990  – to reflect the nature and extent of the offending and for the sentencing Court to have a wider range of penalties available.

Mike Shaw, Group Manager Criminal Invesitgations Team at the ICO said:

”People who think it’s worth their while to obtain and disclose personal data without permission should think again.

“Although this was a data protection issue, in this case we were able to prosecute beyond data protection laws resulting in a tougher penalty to reflect the nature of the criminal behaviour.

“Members of the public and organisations can be assured that we will push the boundaries and use any tool at our disposal to protect their rights.

“Data obtained in these circumstances is a valuable commodity, and there was evidence of customers receiving unwarranted calls from claims management companies causing unnecessary anxiety and distress.

“The potential reputational damage to affected companies whose data is stolen in this way can be immeasurable. Both Nationwide Accident Repair Services and Audatex have put appropriate technical and organisational measures in place to ensure that this cannot happen again.”

Mr Kasim pleaded guilty to a charge of securing unauthorised access to personal data between 13 January 2016 and 19 October 2016, at a hearing in September 2018 and was sentenced at Wood Green Crown Court.

Confiscation proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act, to recover any benefit obtained as a result of the offending, have been commenced and are ongoing.

It’s not obvious to me why this case resulted in prison time while another case involving NARS employee wrongdoing in 2016 resulted in (only) a fine earlier this year. DataBreaches.net reached out to the ICO’s press office to ask. Was this case really so much worse in the ICO’s opinion than the other case? I’ve written to the ICO to ask for any clarification on why this one resulted in prison time. When I get a response, I’ll post it.

Update: The ICO responded to my inquiry, saying,

“The earlier case of Bagnall was charged differently under s55 of the Data Protection Act 1998 which does not carry a custodial sentence. The offending in this particular case was on a smaller scale.”

For those who like bright lines, that may not be satisfactory, but it’s something.

Category: HackNon-U.S.Of Note

Post navigation

← LPL Financial notifying advisors after Capital Forensics, Inc. was hacked
FL: Health First, Inc. notified 42,000 patients after phishing incident →

2 thoughts on “UK: Six month prison sentence for motor industry employee in first ICO Computer Misuse Act prosecution”

  1. Robin says:
    November 13, 2018 at 6:57 am

    Presumably as the defendant in the other case was still an employee of NARS with legitimate access to the system, it would have been hard to prosecute them under the Computer Misuse Act so they decided to settle for the DPA with lighter penalties. Whereas this guy had no legitimate access to the system and was using other people’s credentials so they had him bang to rights under the Computer Misuse Act and used it to get a custodial sentence.

    1. Dissent says:
      November 13, 2018 at 8:38 am

      According to the ICO, who just emailed me their response, the difference was based on the scale of the offending.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • ICE takes steps to deport the Australian hacker known as “DR32”
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Decision That Murdered Privacy
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.