DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

San Mateo Medical Center notifies patients after records erroneously recycled instead of shredded

Posted on December 1, 2018 by Dissent

Updated Feb. 22, 2019.  DataBreaches.net was notified that HHS had finally removed the disputed listing from their portal.  But when I checked, I found that it had not really been removed.  OCR had closed its case and moved the entry to its archived  list, with the following note:

On November 13, 2018, OCR received a breach notification report from San Mateo Medical Center (SMMC). SMMC reported that the breach affected approximately 5,000 individuals. After an internal investigation, SMMC determined that the report was filed in error, the incident did not amount to a breach and, the incident should not have been reported since no breach occurred. Based on this information, OCR closed the case.
Under the circumstances, it’s not clear why HHS didn’t just delete the entry entirely.
Previous Update: Note: Following publication of this story, DataBreaches.net was contacted by an SMMC employee who was very upset at what he claimed was inaccurate reporting by this site. He suggested that I do a “sanity-check” on reporting and was upset that I had reported that 5,000 patients were notified. I pointed out to him that the 5,000 figure came from HHS’s public breach tool. He backed off a bit and said he would investigate as that had not been reported to HHS. I never heard back from him or anyone else. As of Dec. 7, the 5,000 figure is still on HHS’s breach tool. So is the correct number 500 or  5000 or something else? At this point, DataBreaches.net is really not sure.

The San Mateo Medical Center has notified 5,000 patients at its Daly City Medical Center location of a breach.

A November 30 notice on its web site explains that SMMC  became aware on November 7, 2018 that on November 6, a

staff person at the Daly City Clinic left a box containing patient information under her desk overnight. The temporary housekeeping staff mistook the box for recycling and put the documents in the recycling bin and not the confidential bin for shredding.

SMMC was unable to determine whose records were in the bin, and so wound up notifying 5,000 patients.

In response to the incident, SMMC reinforced their policies about records to be shredded and eliminated the use of recycling bins altogether:

We regret that this incident occurred, and are reinforcing our policy that medical staff should place all documents with patient information in the confidential bin for shredding and not leave documents with patient information out overnight. A clinic site visit was conducted on November 8, 2018 and November 16, 2018. The clinic manager for Daly City instructed that recycling bins no longer be used and confidential information be immediately placed in a confidential shred bin.

Read their complete notification on their web site.

Category: Health DataPaperU.S.

Post navigation

← Judge Orders Software Exec to Turn Over Laptop After He Leaked Data on Facebook
IA: Data breach found in city of Ames’ parking ticket payment system. It’s Click2Gov, again. →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked
  • UK: Legal Aid Agency hit by cyber security incident
  • Public notice for individuals affected by an information security breach in the Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division of Helsinki
  • PowerSchool paid a hacker’s extortion demand, but now school district clients are being extorted anyway (3)
  • Defending Against UNC3944: Cybercrime Hardening Guidance from the Frontlines

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed
  • Apple Siri Eavesdropping Payout Deadline Confirmed—How To Make A Claim
  • Privacy matters to Canadians – Privacy Commissioner of Canada marks Privacy Awareness Week with release of latest survey results
  • Missouri Clinic Must Give State AG Minor Trans Care Information
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.