DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

To protect the health and well-being of patients scheduled for surgery, Columbia Surgical Specialists paid ransom

Posted on March 7, 2019 by Dissent

DataBreaches.net has received a statement from Columbia Surgical Specialists in Spokane about the ransomware incident that they recently reported to HHS as impacting up to 400,000 patients.  Subsequent and ongoing investigation suggests that the number affected may be substantially lower.

According to the statement sent to this site, the practice became aware of the attack on January 9.Investigation by Intrinium, their IT security provider, could not definitively conclude that no ePHI had been accessed or exfiltrated, but because it could have been exposed, all potentially impacted patients are being notified.

The encrypted files/systems contained patient names and, potentially, drivers’ license, social security numbers and other protected health information.

Ransom Paid

Columbia Surgical Specialists paid the ransom demanded.  As they explain in their notification:

Yes, we paid $14,649.09.  We received notice from the people that encrypted the files just a few hours before several patients were scheduled for surgeries, and they made it clear we would not have access to patient information until we paid a fee.  We quickly determined that the health and well-being of our patients was the number one concern, and when we made the payment they gave us the decryption key so we could immediately proceed unlocking the data. (Again, we believe the information was locked, but not obtained, by the perpetrators). The payment came from the doctors who own Columbia, and will not be passed on to our patients.

The full notification appears below.  It sounds like they still have a lot of work ahead of them, including figuring out how  the ransomware got injected,  how to prevent a recurrence,  and how they might segregate data differently or disconnect some from the internet so that future attackers do not have access to so much data if or when there is another successful attack.   But their experience is a reminder at how challenging it can be to provide urgent patient care or surgery if you suddenly were to lose access to the patient’s records.

Notification Letter

Related:

  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • How many courts have had sealed and sensitive files exposed by one vendor's error?
  • Ukrainian Conti Ransomware Suspect Extradited to US from Ireland
  • Legal Aid Agency chief admits difficulties understanding impact of cyberattack
  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • The 4TB time bomb: when EY's cloud went public (and what it taught us)
Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHealth DataMalwareOf Note

Post navigation

← Marriott CEO apologizes for data breach, unsure if China responsible
“Vigilance” admits government computer hacking in retaliation for Philando Castile →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.