DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Class action lawsuit filed against Puerto Rican hospitals that sufffered ransomware attack

Posted on February 13, 2020 by Dissent

A potential class action lawsuit has been filed against two hospitals in Puerto Rico that experienced a ransomware attack in February 2019.

On February 15, 2019, there was a media report that the defendant hospitals in the suit — Pavia Hospital Santurce and Pavia Hospital Hato Rey — had suffered a ransomware attack that was discovered on February 12. At the time, the  hospitals reported that they had no evidence that any protected health information had been exposed.

The incident was reported to HHS on April 13, 2019 as impacting 305,737 patients. The incident is listed on the breach tool in the “under investigation” section.

According to the complaint, filed on February 11 in District Court for Puerto Rico, notification letters were first sent to patients on June 18, 2019. DataBreaches.net has yet to find a copy of that notification to see what it says about protected health information — was there evidence that it was actually accessed? The exhibits to the complaint do not include a copy of the notification letter. The complaint states:

Plaintiffs and Class Members suffered significant injuries and damages. On information and belief, the security breach compromised the full names, addresses, dates of birth, gender, financial information, and social security numbers

DataBreaches.net has sent an inquiry to one of the hospitals requesting a copy of the notification letter.

So what injury is alleged in the complaint? It appears to be the standard complaint that plaintiffs — none of whom allege that they have experienced fraud or identity theft — have had to pay for monitoring services and will be at risk for years of fraud and other harms. There is no claim that the stolen data has actually been misused or even that it has shown up in any dark web marketplaces, etc. This is all about the cost of monitoring and what might happen in the future.

Most of the complaint merely rehashes studies and statements about the risks of hacked data, etc.  And of course, it alleges that the entities did not uphold their duty of care to patients as established by HIPAA and the FTC, etc.

As complaints go, this one would likely have been tossed out years ago, but the times, they are a-changing, and I guess we’ll have to see what the court does with this one or as more information becomes available.

Category: Health DataU.S.

Post navigation

← NV: Hackers compromise financial information for Carson City residents who pay water bill online
Don’t expect a speedy trial date in the case of the alleged member of thedarkoverlord →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC
  • CISA Alert: Updated Guidance on Play Ransomware
  • Almost one year later, U.S. Dermatology Partners is still not being very transparent about their 2024 breach
  • Oklahoma Expands its Security Breach Notification Law
  • Ransomware group Gunra claims to have exfiltrated 450 million patient records from American Hospital Dubai.
  • North Shore University Sleep Disorders Center employee charged with secretly recording patients in restrooms
  • When ransomware listings create confusion as to who the victim was

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious
  • Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules
  • State Data Minimization Laws Spark Compliance Uncertainty

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.