DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

REvil claims to have sold Trump-related material to unnamed buyer

Posted on May 18, 2020 by Dissent

The Sodinokibi/REvil ransomware team that attacked the entertainment law firm of Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks have certainly gotten media attention for this attack. In their first notice of the attack, they listed some of the celebrity clients, showed screenshots of some directory of files, and provided snippets from some celebrity-related files.

But then negotiations apparently fell apart and the attackers issued a press release saying that they were doubling the ransom demand to make it $42 million, and that they would begin dumping data.  They dumped some files from Lady GaGa but also introduced a new threat — that they would dump dirt on President Trump.

When the media posted articles citing sources that said that Trump was never a client of the law firm and that the law firm had no intention of paying any ransom to “cyberterrorists,” the attackers issued a second press release, providing some “harmless” files that referenced Trump, and warning the firm that they would get money one way or the other – including the option of auctioning off celebrity files on a dark web auction site that is known for auction personal data of important figures.

Today, they issued their third press release:

For press #3 (Lawyer case)

Interested people contacted us and agreed to buy all the data about the US president, which we have accumulated over the entire time of our activity. We are pleased with the deal and keep our word.

05/25/2020 we are preparing to auction Madonna data. The rules are the same:
1. One-handed information
2. Confidentiality of the transaction
3. We delete our copy of the data
4. The buyer has the right to do whatever he sees fit with the data received.

Starting price – 1 million dollars.

So will Madonna try to buy her own files to hopefully keep them out of the public’s eye? Will someone obsessed with her try to buy them?  Will everyone just shrug?

Stay tuned, I guess, on that. But does anyone believe that anyone really bought data on Trump from REvil? I can see parties being interested in it as opposition research if there was really anything in the law firm’s files that would be useful, but if Trump wasn’t a client, then how much dirt was the law firm actually likely to possess?  We may never know the answer to this one.


Related:

  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • British institutions to be banned from paying ransoms to Russian hackers
  • Michigan ‘ATM jackpotting’: Florida men allegedly forced machines to dispense $107K
  • Authorities released free decryptor for Phobos and 8base ransomware
  • Missouri Adopts New Data Breach Notice Law
  • Qantas obtains injunction to prevent hacked data’s release
Category: Business SectorMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Capital One Judge Skeptical That Breach Report Is Privileged
PsyGenics notifies patients after discovering employee emailed patient info to her personal email account →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Justice Department Announces Coordinated Disruption Actions Against BlackSuit (Royal) Ransomware Operations
  • NL: Hackers breach cancer screening data of almost 500,000 women
  • Violent Crypto Crimes Surge in 2025 Amid Massive Data Leaks
  • Why Ransomware Attacks Are Decreasing in 2025
  • KR: Yes24, the largest Internet bookstore in Korea, suffered its second ransomware attack in two months
  • Korea wins world’s top hacking contest for 4th consecutive year
  • 7-Zip Vulnerability Lets Hackers Write Files and Run Malicious Code
  • Connex Credit Union notifies 172,000 members of hacking incident
  • Federal judiciary says it is boosting security after cyberattack; researcher finds new leaks (CORRECTED)
  • Bank of America Refused To Reimburse Georgia Customer After Hackers Hit Account. Then a News Station Showed Up.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Navigating Privacy Gaps and New Legal Requirements for Companies Processing Genetic Data
  • Germany’s top court holds that police can only use spyware to investigate serious crimes
  • Flightradar24 receives reprimand for violating aircraft data privacy rights
  • Nebraska Attorney General Sues GM and OnStar Over Alleged Privacy Violations
  • Federal Court Allows Privacy Related Claims to Proceed in a Proposed Class Action Lawsuit Against Motorola
  • Italian Garante Adopts Statement on Health Data and AI
  • Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.