DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

REvil claims to have sold Trump-related material to unnamed buyer

Posted on May 18, 2020 by Dissent

The Sodinokibi/REvil ransomware team that attacked the entertainment law firm of Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks have certainly gotten media attention for this attack. In their first notice of the attack, they listed some of the celebrity clients, showed screenshots of some directory of files, and provided snippets from some celebrity-related files.

But then negotiations apparently fell apart and the attackers issued a press release saying that they were doubling the ransom demand to make it $42 million, and that they would begin dumping data.  They dumped some files from Lady GaGa but also introduced a new threat — that they would dump dirt on President Trump.

When the media posted articles citing sources that said that Trump was never a client of the law firm and that the law firm had no intention of paying any ransom to “cyberterrorists,” the attackers issued a second press release, providing some “harmless” files that referenced Trump, and warning the firm that they would get money one way or the other – including the option of auctioning off celebrity files on a dark web auction site that is known for auction personal data of important figures.

Today, they issued their third press release:

For press #3 (Lawyer case)

Interested people contacted us and agreed to buy all the data about the US president, which we have accumulated over the entire time of our activity. We are pleased with the deal and keep our word.

05/25/2020 we are preparing to auction Madonna data. The rules are the same:
1. One-handed information
2. Confidentiality of the transaction
3. We delete our copy of the data
4. The buyer has the right to do whatever he sees fit with the data received.

Starting price – 1 million dollars.

So will Madonna try to buy her own files to hopefully keep them out of the public’s eye? Will someone obsessed with her try to buy them?  Will everyone just shrug?

Stay tuned, I guess, on that. But does anyone believe that anyone really bought data on Trump from REvil? I can see parties being interested in it as opposition research if there was really anything in the law firm’s files that would be useful, but if Trump wasn’t a client, then how much dirt was the law firm actually likely to possess?  We may never know the answer to this one.

Related posts:

  • REvil responds to Grubman Shire law firm: “We will get the money”
  • SCOOP: UnitingCare paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to REvil for decryption key and deletion of files
  • Still think you can negotiate with REvil and get your files back? Read this first.
  • Agromart’s data up for auction while threat actors read — and publish — their victim’s emails about the attack
Category: Business SectorMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Capital One Judge Skeptical That Breach Report Is Privileged
PsyGenics notifies patients after discovering employee emailed patient info to her personal email account →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.