DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

A bit more on Nathan Wyatt’s sentencing and what happens next

Posted on September 22, 2020 by Dissent

Because I had no idea how some things work when a convicted defendant is a foreign national who is supposed to pay restitution, and because  I found some elements of Nathan Wyatt’s sentence confusing, I followed up with the U.S. Department of Justice on  his sentence (see my previous post about his guilty plea and sentence).

You can read the court’s judgment and supervised release conditions here. Wyatt was sentenced to 60 months in prison followed by 3 years of supervised release. He was also ordered to pay restitution of almost $1.5 million to victims of TDO.

The following are the answers provided to me by an  Assistant United States Attorney to questions I had put to them about the supervised release and other conditions:

Q: When he is released from jail, can he just go back to the U.K. on his own (voluntarily) or does he have to be deported? What happens to the supervised release?

A:  When he’s released from custody, he can agree to an order of removal and waive formal deportation proceedings. However, that is a separate administrative proceeding that the Department of Justice does not play a role in. Because he has an outstanding restitution obligation, the Court is unlikely to terminate his term of supervision early.

Q: If he hasn’t paid the restitution (and it seems unlikely he will or can), what happens if he returns to the U.K.? Would the victims ever see the money if he never returns to the U.S.?

A: His victims will be paid restitution as long as Mr. Wyatt continues to comply with the terms of supervision.

Q: His attorney had argued (pre-sentence) that he would likely have to serve 85% of any sentence because there would be no halfway house or incentive programs available to him as a UK national. How much credit does he get for time in custody, how much time does he have left to serve, and is he eligible for any kind of good behavior early release down the road?

A: He will have to serve 85% of time, and he is given credit for any time he has spent in federal custody.

The AUSA did not indicate how much credit he is getting for time already in custody, but he was extradited here in December, 2019, so perhaps nine months or so?  At 85%, he would have to serve another 42 months to serve, but then it sounds like he will have three more years of supervised release. With his family back in the U.K., it may be a long time before he can go home again.

This post was edited post-publication to include calculations.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesUncategorized

Post navigation

← International Sting Against Dark Web Vendors Leads to 179 Arrests — Europol
Shopify says two ‘rogue’ employees involved in data breach to obtain customer records →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks
  • Coinbase says hackers bribed staff to steal customer data and are demanding $20 million ransom
  • $28 million in Texas’ cybersecurity funding for schools left unspent
  • Cybersecurity incident at Central Point School District 6

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025
  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report