DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

SunCrypt ransomware group swears off medical entities, sets sights on cybersecurity firms

Posted on September 30, 2020 by Dissent

When the SunCrypt ransomware group opened a leak site where they listed victims who had not paid their ransom demands, they attracted public attention and demonstrated their ability to use the media to their advantage. BleepingComputer reported that SunCrypt operators had reached out to them to introduce themselves as part of the Maze cartel. Days later, BleepingComputer had to update their article with a statement that Maze had denied that SunCrypt was part of their cartel. Was SunCrypt or wasn’t SunCrypt part of the cartel? Although there was some evidence to suggest that they were, Maze’s firm denial left It all in doubt. What wasn’t in doubt, however, was that it was clear that SunCrypt was capable of doing significant harm to victims.

In following up on their previously disclosed victims and leaks, DataBreaches.net noticed that a medical entity who had been listed on SunCrypt’s site no longer appeared on it. Knowing that the threat actors probably would not say why the victim’s name had been removed, DataBreaches.net sent them an inquiry anyway.

Their response was somewhat surprising. Although they wouldn’t comment on the medical entity at all, when asked if they would consider not attacking medical entities going forward, their spokesperson immediately responded, “Already done.”  And they wanted us to know that even when they had attacked a medical entity in the past, they had carefully avoided ever locking up life support systems or interfering with any hospital operations.

“We were aiming for the data,” the spokesperson stated, adding,

We don’t play with people’s lives.  And no further attacks will be carried against medical organizations even in this soft way.

SunCrypt hopes other ransomware groups will follow their model on that, but notes that their commitment not to attack medical entities does not extend to all pharmaceutical companies. It’s an issue that they are still debating because there are “lots of pros and cons.” Although they will not attack companies involved in COVID-19 research or treatment, companies that are part of the beauty industry and that do animal testing might be targeted, the spokesperson explained, although it’s still under consideration.

So SunCrypt pledges to leave medical entities alone, and DataBreaches.net hopes they stick to their pledge on that. But who will be they be focusing on, then?  According to the spokesperson, “Suncrypt is after the cybersecurity companies,” and they say we will all be seeing proof of that very soon.

As to the conflicting claims about their participation in the Maze cartel, the spokesperson would not comment on any previous affairs but stated that at the moment, SunCrypt is not a part of any cartel or ransomware group.

Category: Breach IncidentsMalware

Post navigation

← Anthem agrees to pay $39.5M in latest settlement over 2015 hacking
Ca: Two Telus Health medical service providers pay ransom after 60K client files accessed →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.