DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NC: Haywood County Schools Sends Data Breach Notices for August Ransomware Attack

Posted on January 26, 2021 by Dissent

Becky Johnson reports:

 Hundreds of current and former Haywood County Schools employees got letters this month informing them their private information could have been compromised in a cyberattack against the school system.

A cybercriminal ring hacked the school’s servers in August and attempted to blackmail the school system into paying a ransom in exchange for unlocking the network — including a threat that the hackers would post the data they obtained on the dark web if the school system didn’t pay up.

Read more on Government Technology.

DataBreaches.net had first noted the Haywood attack on August 25 after it was first reported by WYMA.  On September 5, this site noted Bleeping Computer was reporting that it was SunCrypt ransomware, and that the attackers had dumped some of the district’s files on their dedicated leak site.

So why did it take more than four months more for the school district to notify current and former employees?

Note that there is no federal breach notification law that covers the education sector for this type of breach notification.  And Haywood isn’t the only school district to be distressingly slow in notifying those whose identity information has been stolen and either dumped publicly or possibly sold on the dark web.  Just this week a former employee of the Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia informed DataBreaches.net that he had just received a notification letter about their ransomware incident, which also occurred around the same time. The FCPS incident involved Maze ransomware, however, and it appeared that that district paid the ransom to get the attackers to remove the data they had already dumped — but not in time to prevent at least some data winding up in others’ hands.

Breaches in the education sector are often referred to as “low-hanging fruit” because security is generally not as strong as security for other sectors. Isn’t it long past time to have some addressable requirements for the education sector in terms of security and some actual deadlines or timeframes for required notifications in the event of a breach? When employees’ SSN and payroll information are hacked and dumped or are in criminals’ hands, how can it possibly be acceptable to not notify them of that for four or five months? Hopefully, districts did alert at least current employees to take steps to protect themselves and their accounts, but what about former employees who may have moved or no longer look at the district’s web site?

As this site recommended in discussing ransomware incidents in the healthcare sector,  when data have been dumped publicly, the entity should issue some early warning system publicly — even just a brief press release that alerts people who may be impacted and that tells them where to look for updates as they become available.  Leaving people in the dark for four or five months while their data is freely available on the internet in forums or on criminals’ leak sites is just not acceptable. What do these states’ laws say about breach notifications for the education sector?

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Bot Lets Hackers Easily Lookup Facebook Users’ Phone Numbers
Man arrested after UK school finds wiped hard drives on devices connected to network →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks
  • Coinbase says hackers bribed staff to steal customer data and are demanding $20 million ransom
  • $28 million in Texas’ cybersecurity funding for schools left unspent
  • Cybersecurity incident at Central Point School District 6

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025
  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.