DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

It: Union of Comuni Colli del Monferrato, cyber attack: hackers publish data

Posted on April 25, 2021 by Dissent

Marco A. De Felice reports:

The Avaddon ransomware group publishes screenshots of some data stolen during the cyber attack on the Unione di Comuni Colli del Monferrato, but by mistake it puts the wrong Unione (Unione dei Colli DiVini in the heart of Monferrato) under DDoS attack.

Oops? But as Marco notes, that wasn’t the end of their mistakes:

It is not the only mistake of cybercriminals, among the data exfiltrated and published yesterday there is a document from Cisliano, a municipality in the Milanese hinterland and which obviously has nothing to do with the Unions of Municipalities of the province of Asti.

Read more on SuspectFile.

This does not look good for Avaddon, and is the type of sloppy mistakes that we used to see with Maze operators at times.  If you name the wrong victim are you also attempting to extort the wrong victim or sending emails to the wrong victim?

The errors SuspectFile describes are not the only errors spotted on Avaddon’s site this week. In the course of investigating another one of Avaddon’s listings, DataBreaches.net discovered that they had named the wrong victim in that matter, too.  DataBreaches.net has reached out to the real victim to inquire as to whether they ever knew they had been breached and what they are doing about it.  That matter will be reported under a separate post in the near future.

Updated 6:42 pm: If there is a Keystone Kops version of ransomware attacks, Avaddon’s attack on these Italian entities would be it. Marco emailed Avaddon yesterday to suggest they brush up on the Italian geography. Today, he published his post pointing out their errors.  Within hours of the latter, Avaddon revised its listing for the incident. In an update to SuspectFile, Marco observes:

Avaddon changed the post header from “UNION OF THE DIVINE HILLS IN THE HEART OF MONFERRATO” to “MUNICIPALITY OF VILLAFRANCA D’ASTI”, as documented in the image below, also leaving the wrong site still under DDoS attack (unionecolledivini.at.it) which brings together a series of municipalities of the Asti area, but not those of Villafranca d’Asti and Baldichieri d’Asti which instead are part of the Union of Municipalities of the Monferrato Hills (collidelmonferrato.at.it) as can be seen from the documents stolen and published on the Avaddon website.

My head is spinning.  Who did Avaddon actually attack, and who did they send extortion demands to? And why on earth do they keep DDoSing the wrong entity?

Really, if they have any class at all, they shoud decrypt whatever they encrypted, apologize to the entity they DDoSed and purge any files they have.  As Marco pointed out, these agencies are involved in COVID-19 scheduling and public health issues. This is no time to be interfering with their functioning.

Related posts:

  • The Ransomware Superhero of Normal, Illinois
  • Cancer patients in the State of Washington had their sensitive records hacked and dumped. Have they been notified?
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesGovernment SectorMalwareNon-U.S.Of Note

Post navigation

← Es: A synchronized cyber attack affects the INE and ministries such as Justice, Economy or Education
De: Grocer Tegut is the target of a cyber attack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.