DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

San Juan Regional Medical Center updates its breach disclosure

Posted on October 11, 2021 by Dissent

On June 17, 2021, this site noted a breach involving San Juan Regional Medical Center that had been reported to HHS and posted on the entity’s web site.  According to their notification on June 4, the breach occurred September 7-8, 2020, and the threat actor exfiltrated data at that time. In April, 2021, they allegedly discovered that protected health information was involved, and they subsequently notified 68,792 patients. So nine months after the attack, patients were first being notified.

The center’s June 4, 2021 statement has now been replaced, it appears, with a statement of October 7, 2021. That statement replaces the statement of discovery in April, 2021, with a statement that “Following a thorough manual document review of the files that were removed, we discovered on July 13, 2021 that the impacted files contained the personal and protected health information of certain patients who are now being notified.”

So it seems that in July, they discovered additional patients who needed to be notified, and those patients were first notified recently.

It is now more than one year since the medical center was attacked and data exfiltrated and patients are first being notified. SJRMC addresses the gap this way:

SJRMC previously identified and notified patients of this incident. The manual document review of the impacted files was extensive and required significant time to complete. As a result, SJRMC provided two rounds of notification – one in June and one in September.

SJRMC takes this incident and security of personal information very seriously. Cybersecurity threats continue to evolve and as a result, SJRMC has taken additional steps to secure its network and improve internal procedures to identify and remediate future threats. SJRMC continues to assess and update its internal policies and procedures in order to minimize the risk of a similar incident in the future.

Will their explanation suffice to avert any monetary penalties by state or federal regulators or lawsuit by patients? That all remains to be seen. The incident is still open on HHS’s public breach tool, and the number impacted has not been updated there, so we do not know the current estimate of the number impacted.

The center stated that although this was a malware attack, it was not a ransomware incident.  DataBreaches.net has never seen any evidence of any patient data from this incident on any of the dozens of ransomware leak sites created by threat actors or leak sites that are not necessarily confined to ransomware incidents.

So what happened here? The center may not be aware of any misuse, but unless one thinks the hack and exfiltration were for fun, patients whose data has been exfiltrated continue to have cause to be concerned.

Corrected at 12:32 pm to reflect that the the medical center was clear that this was not a ransomware attack although malware was used to exfiltrate data.

Category: Health DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Verizon Phishing Scam Targets Customers Through a Text Message
ReproSource Fertility Diagnostics notifies approximately 350,000 patients after ransomware incident →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news (Updated)
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay
  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.