DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

DNA Diagnostics Center notifying more than 2 million people who used a national genetic testing service

Posted on November 30, 2021 by Dissent

People who had their personal information collected by a national genetic testing organization between 2004 and 2012 may have never known that their information was acquired by DNA Diagnostics Center (DDC) in Ohio in 2012. They may find out now, though, as DDC fell prey to a cyberattack in May and data was exfiltrated over a period of months.

In a press release issued yesterday, DDC explains that on August 6, they detected unauthorized access to their network. The investigation determined that the unauthorized access and data exfiltration was confined to a database DDC had acquired in 2012 when it purchased a national genetic testing service, but it had never used the database in its operations. Some of those who had data in the database had relationship testing as a part of court proceedings or independent, individual testing. [Although DDC’s statements do not name the genetic testing service they acquired, from the timing, it may be Orchid Cellmark, a testing service that provided paternity testing for forensic and government purposes.]

The access and exfiltration occurred between May 24 and July 28 of this year.

The impacted database was associated with a national genetic testing organization that DDC has never used in its operations and has not been active since 2012. DDC acquired certain assets from this national genetic testing organization in 2012 that included certain personal information, and therefore, impacts from this incident are not associated with DDC. However, impacted individuals may have had their information, such as Social Security numbers or payment information, impacted as a result.

From their press release and statement, it appears that DDC is trying to negotiate payment to get the data recovered:

DDC has taken steps, in coordination with its third-party cybersecurity experts, to regain possession of this personal information and ensure its safekeeping and is not aware of any reports of identity fraud or improper use of the information.

Don’t they know that criminals lie and that paying to have data destroyed is often just money thrown out as a copy of the data will almost certainly be retained by threat actors and may be sold again, misused, or otherwise shared?

According to the report to Maine by the firm’s external counsel, McDonald Hopkins PLC, the breach impacted 2,102,436 individuals.

Update: This post was corrected post-publication to replace  “ransomware attack” with “cyberattack” because DataBreaches.net learned that this was not a ransomware incident.  

 

Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataMalwareOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Seventh months after initial discovery, Broward Public Schools discloses Conti attack also impacted employees’ health insurance data
Medsurant Health discloses ransomware incident, but not yet notifying patients →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware group Gunra claims to have exfiltrated 450 million patient records from American Hospital Dubai.
  • North Shore University Sleep Disorders Center employee charged with secretly recording patients in restrooms
  • When ransomware listings create confusion as to who the victim was
  • Rajkot civic body’s GIS website hit by cyber attack, over 400 GB data feared stolen
  • Taiwan’s BitoPro hit by NT$345 million cryptocurrency hack
  • Texas gastroenterology and surgical practice victim of ransomware attack
  • Romanian Citizen Pleads Guilty to ‘Swatting’ Numerous Members of Congress, Churches, and Former U.S. President
  • North Dakota Enacts Financial Data Security and Data Breach Notification Requirements
  • Pro-Ukraine hacker group Black Owl poses ‘major threat’ to Russia, Kaspersky says
  • Vanta bug exposed customers’ data to other customers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Florida ban on kids using social media likely unconstitutional, judge rules
  • State Data Minimization Laws Spark Compliance Uncertainty
  • Supreme Court Agrees to Clarify Emergency Situations Where Police Don’t Need Warrant
  • Stewart Baker vs. Orin Kerr on “The Digital Fourth Amendment”
  • Fears Grow Over ICE’s Reach Into Schools
  • Resource: HoganLovells Asia-Pacific Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Guide 2025
  • She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.