DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

DNA Diagnostics Center notifying more than 2 million people who used a national genetic testing service

Posted on November 30, 2021 by Dissent

People who had their personal information collected by a national genetic testing organization between 2004 and 2012 may have never known that their information was acquired by DNA Diagnostics Center (DDC) in Ohio in 2012. They may find out now, though, as DDC fell prey to a cyberattack in May and data was exfiltrated over a period of months.

In a press release issued yesterday, DDC explains that on August 6, they detected unauthorized access to their network. The investigation determined that the unauthorized access and data exfiltration was confined to a database DDC had acquired in 2012 when it purchased a national genetic testing service, but it had never used the database in its operations. Some of those who had data in the database had relationship testing as a part of court proceedings or independent, individual testing. [Although DDC’s statements do not name the genetic testing service they acquired, from the timing, it may be Orchid Cellmark, a testing service that provided paternity testing for forensic and government purposes.]

The access and exfiltration occurred between May 24 and July 28 of this year.

The impacted database was associated with a national genetic testing organization that DDC has never used in its operations and has not been active since 2012. DDC acquired certain assets from this national genetic testing organization in 2012 that included certain personal information, and therefore, impacts from this incident are not associated with DDC. However, impacted individuals may have had their information, such as Social Security numbers or payment information, impacted as a result.

From their press release and statement, it appears that DDC is trying to negotiate payment to get the data recovered:

DDC has taken steps, in coordination with its third-party cybersecurity experts, to regain possession of this personal information and ensure its safekeeping and is not aware of any reports of identity fraud or improper use of the information.

Don’t they know that criminals lie and that paying to have data destroyed is often just money thrown out as a copy of the data will almost certainly be retained by threat actors and may be sold again, misused, or otherwise shared?

According to the report to Maine by the firm’s external counsel, McDonald Hopkins PLC, the breach impacted 2,102,436 individuals.

Update: This post was corrected post-publication to replace  “ransomware attack” with “cyberattack” because DataBreaches.net learned that this was not a ransomware incident.  

 

No related posts.

Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataMalwareOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Seventh months after initial discovery, Broward Public Schools discloses Conti attack also impacted employees’ health insurance data
Medsurant Health discloses ransomware incident, but not yet notifying patients →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.