DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

FTC Finalizes Order with Mortgage Analytics Firm, Requiring it to Strengthen Security Safeguards, Increase Oversight of Vendors

Posted on January 6, 2022 by Dissent

In December, 2020, the FTC announced a proposed settlement with Texas-based Ascension Data & Analytics after a security breach involving one of its vendors resulted in the exposure of, and unauthorized access to, consumers’ mortgage applications.  One year later, the settlement received final approval, as the FTC announced on December 22:

The Federal Trade Commission has given final approval to a settlement with a mortgage industry data analytics firm that will require the company to bolster its data security protections and oversight of its vendors to ensure third-party providers are also complying with those safeguards.

In a complaint first announced in December 2020, the FTC alleged that Texas-based Ascension Data & Analytics, LLC violated the Gramm-Leach Bliley Act’s Safeguards Rule, which requires financial institutions to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive information security program and ensure third-party vendors are capable of implementing and maintaining appropriate safeguards for customer information. The FTC alleged that Ascension failed to do this.

The FTC alleged that a vendor Ascension hired to perform text recognition scanning on mortgage documents stored the contents of the documents—which included names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers and other personal information—on a cloud-based server in plain text, without any protections to block unauthorized access, such as requiring a password. As a result, the server with the mortgage information was accessed dozens of times.

After receiving one comment on the settlement, which also was announced in December 2020, the Commission voted 2-1-1 to finalize the settlement and to send a response to the commenter.

Chair Lina M. Khan did not participate. Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter voted no and issued a dissenting statement.

Zack Whittaker provides more of the details and background on the data leak that had been first investigated and reported by TechCrunch.


Related:

  • 'Trickery and f...ery': Agency under fire over senior manager's 'serious' privacy breach
  • Little Rock Psychologist Indicted by Federal Grand Jury for Defrauding Medicare and Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield
  • Software companies must be held liable for British economic security, say MPs
  • UK privacy regulator has seen ‘collapse in enforcement activity,’ rights coalition says
  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesFederalFinancial SectorLegislationOf NoteSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Administrative fine imposed on psychotherapy centre Vastaamo for data protection violations
FlexBooker discloses data breach, over 3.7 million accounts impacted →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.