DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

A Missouri Reporter Is (Still) Getting Blamed For the Security Flaw He Exposed

Posted on January 11, 2022 by Dissent

Jack Gillum sought — and obtained — some records from Missouri Governor Parson’s office concerning the governor’s staff’s public statements and the governor’s intention to try to prosecute journalist Josh Renaud. Renaud’s crime: he discovered a vulnerability on a state website where by clicking the F12 key to view the source of a page, one could see teachers’ social security numbers exposed in plain text.  Renaud verified his discovery and then notified the state, delaying publication until the state could secure the data.

Instead of thanking the reporter and his newspaper — as the state initially planned to do — the governor did an about-face and called the journalist a “hacker” and is pushing to have him prosecuted under a state law.

Nothing has changed since the story first made news in October. The governor continues to insist that the reporter is likely to be prosecuted, while most members of the press and researchers point out the dangerous situation that would result — where people will be afraid to disclose vulnerabilities to the state.

Yes, Missouri’s law has wording that might seemingly allow Missouri to prosecute anyone who gains access to others’ personal information without their authorization, but did the law really anticipate the governor going after those researchers or journalists who responsibly disclose or report on breaches or leaks?

Gillum’s article can be found on Bloomberg, here.

So…. what will Governor Parsons do when journalists report on ransomware incidents involving Missouri entities where data involving personal information has been dumped by threat actors and viewed and reported upon by journalists?  Look at these provisions in their law:

 (3)  Discloses or takes data, programs, or supporting documentation, residing or existing internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network; or

[…]

(6)  Receives, retains, uses, or discloses any data he knows or believes was obtained in violation of this subsection.

 So does that mean reporting on a data dump from a criminal hack unlawfully “uses” or “discloses” data?

DataBreaches.net does not believe that investigating and reporting on cybercrime is a crime.  See also today’s report on the ransomware attack on Carthage R-9 district.

Related posts:

  • Report: Missouri Governor’s Office Responsible for Teacher Data Leak
  • Governor Hochul Announces Nation-Leading Cybersecurity Strategy
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorGovernment SectorState/Local

Post navigation

← Connecticut company that hosts school websites recovering from ransomware attack
Major Indian fashion retailer hacked and data leaked →

3 thoughts on “A Missouri Reporter Is (Still) Getting Blamed For the Security Flaw He Exposed”

  1. anonymous says:
    January 11, 2022 at 11:32 am

    wha-.
    The SSN’s were being transmitted in plain text over the wire regardless.
    Viewing the page source is not hacking any more than viewing the main web page.
    If that’s hacking then I’m hacking by reading this article.

  2. Dave says:
    January 11, 2022 at 11:37 am

    An entity published privileged information publicly. The reporter read that information and wrote a story on it.

    The crime is that the entity failed to keep privileged information confidential, right?

    1. Joe says:
      January 14, 2022 at 2:16 pm

      No… he gave them time to secure their site and he never published confidential info.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.