DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Polish DPA imposes a fine on Warsaw University of Technology for not complying with its obligation

Posted on January 15, 2022 by Dissent

Background information

Date of final decision: 9 December 2021
National case
Controller: Warsaw University of Technology
Legal Reference: Principles (Art. 5(1)(f), Art. 5(2)), Data protection by design and by default (Art. 25(1)), Security of processing (Art. 32(1), Art. 32(2))
Decision: infringement of GDPR, fine issued
Key words: principles, processing, security, data protection

 

Summary of the Decision

Origin of the case

The proceedings against the Warsaw University of Technology was initiated after the Polish Data Protection Authority received a data breach notification. As it was indicated, an unauthorized person downloaded from the controller’s IT network resources a database containing personal data of students and lecturers (over 5 thousand people).

Key Finding

As it was established during the administrative proceedings, the establishment of the Warsaw University of Technology used an application created by the University’s employees to enrol for courses and allowed the user to have insight into the history of teaching, grades and calculations of fees. This application was modified depending on the controller’s needs. At the beginning of January 2020, an unauthorized person having credentials used the functionality of uploading files to the application. In turn, at the beginning of May 2020, an unauthorized download of personal data was made.

Warsaw University of Technology did not implement the appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure the security of the personal data processed.

Moreover, the University failed to regularly test, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of measures and did not take into consideration the risk related to the processing of data within the application.

Decision

Taking into account the controller’s failure to comply with its obligations and the high risk of adverse effects in the future for persons affected by the incident, the Polish Data Protection Authority found it reasonable and necessary to impose an administrative fine of PLN 45,000 (approximately EUR 9,900).

For further information (decision in national language):
https://www.uodo.gov.pl/decyzje/DKN.5130.2559.2020%20

 

The news published here does not constitute official EDPB communication, nor an EDPB endorsement. This news item was originally published by the national supervisory authority and was published here at the request of the SA for information purposes. Any questions regarding this news item should be directed to the supervisory authority concerned.

 

Source: EDPB


Related:

  • Cyberattack disables Onsolve Code Red emergency alert system across St. Louis region (1)
  • CrowdStrike catches insider feeding information to ScatteredLapsus$Hunters
  • Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack
  • Threat actors have reportedly launched yet another campaign involving an application connected to Salesforce
  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorHackNon-U.S.Of Note

Post navigation

← The definitions of “recently” and “discovered” leave a lot to be desired
North Korean hackers stole nearly $400 million in crypto last year →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.