DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NY State Comptroller DiNapoli Releases School District Audits

Posted on February 3, 2022 by Dissent

Arkport Central School District – Network Access Controls (2021M-162)

January 28, 2022

Quick Facts about the District:

Enabled Network User Accounts
Student 489
Non-Student 259
Total 748
IT Vendor Contract Services
2021 Expenditures $602,824

Audit Period

July 1, 2020 – September 21, 2021

Audit Objective

Determine whether Arkport Central School District (District) officials ensured network access controls were secure.

Key Findings

District officials did not ensure that the District’s network access controls were secure.

  • District officials did not establish written policies or procedures to add or disable user accounts and permissions.
  • The District had 92 unneeded network user accounts and nine user accounts with unnecessary administrative permissions.

In addition, sensitive IT control weaknesses were communicated confidentially to officials.

Key Recommendations

  • Establish written policies or procedures for managing network user accounts.
  • Regularly review network user accounts and disable those that are unnecessary.
  • Assess network user permissions on a regular basis and ensure that network user accounts provide users with appropriate permissions needed to perform their job duties.

District officials generally agreed with our recommendations and indicated they will take corrective action. Appendix B includes our comment on the District’s response.

Read the full report (pdf)

 

Nyack Union Free School District – Network User Accounts (2021M-113)

January 28, 2022

Quick Facts about the District:

Network User Accounts Reviewed
Staff 464
Non-Employee 254
Generic 171
Total 889

Audit Period

July 1, 2018 – December 1, 2020

We extended the audit scope through March 15, 2021 to complete our IT testing.

Audit Objective

Determine whether Nyack Union Free School District (District) officials adequately managed and monitored network user accounts.

Key Findings

District officials did not ensure that network user accounts were adequately managed and monitored. Officials did not:

  • Monitor compliance with the District’s computer acceptable use policy.
  • Maintain a current authorized user list.

Sensitive information technology (IT) control weaknesses were communicated confidentially in a separate letter to officials.

Key Recommendations

  • Monitor compliance with the computer acceptable use policy.
  • Develop written procedures for managing system access that include periodically reviewing user access and disabling unnecessary network user accounts.

District officials agreed with our recommendations and indicated they will take and have taken corrective action.

Read the full report (pdf)

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation Sector

Post navigation

← Security issue may have made some personal information vulnerable on WSDOT system
Rhode Island attorney general subpoenas RIPTA, UnitedHealthcare over data breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.