DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

TX: Val Verde Regional Medical Center patient data dumped by LockBit

Posted on March 25, 2022 by Dissent

Val Verde Regional Medical Center (VVRMC) appears to have been the victim of a ransomware attack involving LockBit.

According to LockBit, Val Verde Memorial Hospital was compromised and 96,000 patient records were exfiltrated. The listing was added to the leak site on March 16, with LockBit noting that the patient records had the following table format:

PatientID|AccountNo|MRN|FirstName|MiddleName|LastName|Email|Address1|Address2|City|State|Phone|Mobile|Pager|Zip|DOB|SSN|Gender|Status|Type|Emp Name|Emp Addr 1|Emp Addr 2|Emp City|Emp State|Emp Zip|Emp Phone|PCP|Marital|GuarantorName|GuarantorDOB|Guarantor Relation|ReferringDR|RenderingDR|Notes

The March 16 listing provided examples of patient records.

DataBreaches.net sent inquiries to VVRMC on March 17 and March 18, but received no reply.

Yesterday, Lockbit dumped almost 400 MB of patient data.

DataBreaches.net sent another inquiry to VVMRC today, but again, there was no reply. There is no notice on their website, no listing on HHS’s public breach tool at this time, and no press release or media notice that this site has been able to find.

The data dump is pretty much exactly what you would expect given the listing LockBit had posted as a sample. All of the data files were in plain text and included demographic information and health insurance information. One of the files also included the medical purpose of a patient’s visit.

DataBreaches.net did not attempt to calculate the total number of unique patients, but there were 96,000 records in the Patients file, more than 53,000 entries in the Patient Contacts file, and more than 85,000 entries in the Patient Insurance file.

On March 24, LockBit dumped patient data from VVMRC. Image: DataBreaches.net

This post will be updated if more information becomes available.

Update of May 26, 2022: As noted elsewhere, LockBit dumped more Val Verde data (what they claimed was 150 GB of files) on April 8.  Today, Val Verde has issued a press release, a copy of which is also posted on the medical center’s website. The notification indicates that the breach occurred on March 10 (less than one week before LockBit added it to their leak site). It does not reveal that LockBit dumped a lot of patient data on the dark web. The incident is not yet posted on HHS’s public breach tool, so we still do not have a number for how many patients were potentially impacted.

Update of May 27, 2022:  The number was reported to HHS as 86,562.


Related:

  • Russian hackers target IVF clinics across UK used by thousands of couples
  • US, allies sanction Russian bulletproof hosting services for ransomware support
  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (2)
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
Category: Breach IncidentsHealth DataMalware

Post navigation

← Cybercriminal Connected to Multimillion Dollar Ransomware Attacks Sentenced for Online Fraud Schemes
BCBS of Kansas subcontractor offers free protection to members put at risk by data breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.