DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Monetary penalties issued to Spanish telecoms over failure to protect consumers from sim swapping

Posted on April 3, 2022 by Dissent

Last year the Spanish DPA tackled sim swapping cases and issued monetary penalties to four telecoms for failure to adequately protect the confidential information of consumers, resulting in loss of service to consumers, but also leaving them victims or potential victims of bank fraud. Four decisions have now been posted on the EDPB website. The links will take you to an English summary of each case. As you can see below, there was a large range in the monetary penalties.

Spanish SA imposes a fine on Vodafone España, for a loss of confidentiality related to mobile phone sim card duplicate and a lack of accountability:

Decision:  Imposition of a fine of 3.940.000’00 euros for the violation. The penalty also included a fine for a second finding that they had not implemented an effective GDPR compliance and management model to avoid the risk of identity theft.

Spanish SA imposes a fine on Orange Espagne, for a loss of confidentiality related to mobile phone sim card duplicate:

Decision:  Imposition of a fine of 700,000 euros

Spanish SA imposes a fine on Xfera Móviles, for a loss of confidentiality related to mobile phone sim card duplicate:

Decision:  Imposition of a fine of 200,000 euros

Spanish SA imposes a fine on Orange España Virtual, for a loss of confidentiality related to mobile phone sim card duplicate:

Decision:  Imposition of a fine of 70.000 euros

Meanwhile, in the U.S……

Last year, the FCC proposed rulemaking to address sim swapping, after more than one and a half years of everyone saying that something needed to be done. The big telecoms responded with statements explaining what they were already doing and suggesting that any new regulations might hinder those efforts.

Has any U.S. regulator ever fined a telecom for failure to prevent sim swapping or for harm that occurred to consumers? Or is it the situation that we still have no regulations or laws and no real consequences for telecoms that fail to protect consumers from this?


Related:

  • UN Cybercrime Convention to be signed in Hanoi to tackle global offences
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesNon-U.S.Of Note

Post navigation

← Vietnamese bank accounts targeted by hackers
An Interview with AgainstTheWest →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.