DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Insufficient Data Security and Disregard for Student Data Privacy Plague the DeKalb County School District; With Commentary by Jim Siegl

Posted on May 9, 2022 by Dissent

Keegan Brooks writes:

The DeKalb County School District has been making thousands of files containing sensitive student and staff information widely accessible to anyone in the district.

Types of information exposed have included social security numbers, academic records, medical forms, course transcripts, standardized test scores, discipline records, and the 504/IEP information of students, among others. These files exposed the information of thousands of students and staff members from schools across the county.

This was caused by many files within the district being shared with “everyone except external users” by staff members — “everyone” in this case being the more than 93,000 students and 15,500 employees in the district.

Read more at the Chamblee High School student paper, The Blue and Gold.

In response to this article, DataBreaches.net reached out to the District on Friday to ask them to respond to the allegations. As of the time of this publication, they have not responded at all.

DataBreaches also reached out to Jim Siegl, Senior Technologist at the Future of Privacy Forum, to ask him for his comments on what Brooks wrote.

Siegl introduces himself, in part by writing:

Having managed a very large (~250,000 user) Google Education domain for a decade in a prior job, my educated guess is that this is could be caused by an inappropriate setting in the district’s google administrator console at one pint in time, or it could be the result of end users, including staff not understanding the impact of their choices when they share files. 

Figuring out what happened is complicated, since the settings and options in Google Workspace have changed over the years, but this is a problem I am very familiar with.

Siegl, whose personal website is appropriately named PrivacyIsHard.net, responded with a detailed commentary that is extremely helpful for those of us trying to understand the allegations and how such things can occur. His article suggests specific actions the district might want to take if they have not done so already, and specific questions concerned students like Keegan Brooks might want to ask the district using a public records request.

Read Siegl’s thoughtful commentary to the Blue and Gold’s concerns in his article, Oversharing is Not Caring: A reminder that for schools, privacy is hard, it is everyone’s job and that vendor defaults, communication, training and auditing access matter

 

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorExposureOf Note

Post navigation

← Sunday notes: Welldyne, North Alabama Bone & Joint Clinic disclose breaches affecting patient data
Lawyers are nearing a settlement deal for the infamous 2015 OPM hack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.