DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Recent decisions by the Data Protection Commissioner of Singapore

Posted on July 18, 2022 by Dissent

Recent decisions by the Data Protection Commissioner of Singapore include the following:

Directions were issued to Crawfort Pte to conduct a security audit of its technical and administrative arrangements for its AWS S3 environment and rectify any security gaps identified in the audit report. This is pursuant to a data breach incident where Crawfort’s customer database was offered for sale on the dark web. The data had been exposed during a one-week period.  Read more here.

A financial penalty of $10,000 was imposed on Audio House for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements to protect the personal data in its possession from a ransomware attack. (Note: This incident was an ALTDOS attack reported by DataBreaches). The organization admitted to the breach and its responsibility and cooperated fully. Its internal investigations revealed that PHP files used to develop a web application on its website contained vulnerabilities that allowed the threat actor to carry out a SQL injection attack.  Read more of the Commissioner’s decision here.

A financial penalty of $67,000 was imposed on Quoine for failing to put in place reasonable security arrangements to protect the personal data in its possession. As a result of social engineering attacks on employees of its domain provider, an employee of the domain provider incorrectly transferred control of Quoine’s domain hosting account to an external actor who accessed and exfiltrated the personal data of 652,564 of its customers. The data elements included:

(a) First name and surname;
(b) Address;
(c) Email address;
(d) Telephone number (optional);
(e) Photo-image of documents provided by 362,035 customers for KYC purposes before 13 October 2018, namely, NRIC number, passport number or other identification documents, proof of address document, and photograph;
(f) Financial information of Japanese customers of Quoine Corporation, a
Japanese company related to the organization;
(g) Transaction information: fiat deposits and crypto withdrawals, and a 2018 record of balances prior to the launch of the current “Liquid Exchange”; and
(h) For customers depositing and withdrawing fiat currencies: Bank account
and other information, namely, name of the bank, account number and
name of the account holder.


Related:

  • 'Trickery and f...ery': Agency under fire over senior manager's 'serious' privacy breach
  • Software companies must be held liable for British economic security, say MPs
  • Russia arrests young cybersecurity entrepreneur on treason charges
  • UK privacy regulator has seen ‘collapse in enforcement activity,’ rights coalition says
  • SEC Voluntarily Dismisses SolarWinds Litigation
  • A Swath of Bank Customer Data Was Hacked. The F.B.I. Is Investigating.
Category: Business SectorExposureHackNon-U.S.Subcontractor

Post navigation

← Israel’s Health Ministry website down after Iranian cyberattack
Treating Healthcare’s Insider Threat →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • LockBit 5’s “new secure blog domain” infra leaked already
  • NL: Nuenen accidentally leaks addresses of 1,000 asylum center opponents
  • Ex-teen hackers warn parents are clueless as children steal ‘millions’
  • UK Government Considers Computer Misuse Act Revision
  • Japan issues arrest warrant against teen suspected of cyberattack using AI
  • How old is the average hacker? What does a new research report suggest? (1)
  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.