DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Oregon workers’ compensation claimants and policyholders may have had their personal information hacked

Posted on January 9, 2023 by Dissent

Mike Rogoway reports that Oregon’s worker’s compensation insurer, SAIF Corp., experienced a breach in October that potentially compromised policyholders’ information and workers’ compensation claimants’ personal and medical information.

On their breach-related site maintained for them by IDX, SAIF explains that on October 24, there was a brief period during which an unauthorized individual or individuals were able to access and acquire files from their network. They write:

Following an analysis of that data by third-party cybersecurity experts, we have evidence to suggest that the majority of the accessed data was from information collected prior to 2003. If you had a policy or a claim before January 1, 2003, there is a possibility that your data was compromised. For policyholders, that data may have included Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and medical information about employees of policyholders. For claimants, the data may have included Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, financial account numbers, health insurance policy numbers, and medical history information.

They offer no statement as to why they were still storing files from prior to 2003, but a spokesperson for SAIF sent DataBreaches the following statement in response to our question about whether retention was required:

SAIF is subject to ORS 192 requiring records retention and our specific record retention schedule is approved by the Oregon State Archivist. SAIF is required to retain policy files and worker accident claim files for 75 years from the date of the policy or, in the case of a claim, the worker’s injury.

DataBreaches also inquired whether the old files had been connected to the internet without any encryption. The spokesperson responded:

We moved to all electronic files and, as part of this, scanned older paper files. The files were not encrypted but stored on an internal system not exposed to the internet through any of SAIF’s customer facing systems.

SAIF’s statement also states:

There is also evidence a limited amount of recent claimant data may have been impacted. If you are a claimant and received any written communication from SAIF on your claim dated between September 24, 2022, and October 25, 2022, there is a possibility that data was also compromised. This data was limited to the accepted and denied medical conditions in the claim.

According to Rogoway, SAIF notified customers on Dec. 8.  The number of people possibly affected has not been disclosed at this point.

In response to another queston from DataBreaches about whether SAIF has received any ransom message or communication, the spokesperson responded that SAIF did not receive a ransom message.

 

 

 

No related posts.

Category: Breach IncidentsHackMiscellaneousU.S.

Post navigation

← What Twitter’s 200 million email leak really means
When ransom negotiations become public, self-inflicted reputation harm may follow →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • 70% of healthcare cyberattacks result in delayed patient care, report finds
  • Police disrupt “Diskstation” ransomware gang attacking NAS devices
  • Meta fixes bug that could leak users’ AI prompts and generated content
  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Upstate NY county clerk again refuses to enforce Texas abortion judgment
  • Attorney General James Leads Coalition Urging Congress to Protect Americans from Masked ICE Agents
  • Attorney General Tong Announces $85,000 Settlement with TicketNetwork for Violations of the Connecticut Data Privacy Act​
  • Fourth Circuit upholds West Virginia ban on abortion pills
  • Meta fixes bug that could leak users’ AI prompts and generated content
  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.