DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Lubbock Heart and Surgical Hospital sued for breach where no one knows for sure whether data was accessed or acquired

Posted on March 1, 2023 by Dissent

If the victim of a cyberattack cannot determine whether data was accessed or acquired, should that increase the damages sought by plaintiffs in a class action suit? Or should it get the suit tossed out because the plaintiffs can’t prove any theft of their data?

Kelly Mehorter reports about a class action lawsuit filed against Lubbock Heart and Surgical Hospital over a 2022 breach. The hospital notified 23,379 patients about a July incident in September 2022, but then updated their report in December 2022. The updated report frankly admitted, “Our investigation could not determine whether the unauthorized party did, in fact, access or copy any files but was unable to rule it out.”

The types of information that might have been accessed or acquired included names, contact information, demographic information, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, diagnosis and treatment information, prescription information, Medical Record Numbers, provider names, dates of service, and/or health insurance information.

According to the lawsuit filed by plaintiff Joe Lara:

4. It is unknown for precisely how long the cybercriminals had access to Defendant’s
network before the breach was discovered. In other words, Defendant had no effective means to prevent, detect, stop, or mitigate breaches of its systems—thereby allowing cybercriminals
unrestricted access to patients’ PII/PHI.
5. On information and belief, cybercriminals were able to breach Defendant’s inadequate systems because Defendant failed to adequately train its employees on cybersecurity and failed to maintain reasonable security safeguards or protocols to protect the Class’s PII/PHI. In short, Defendant’s failures placed the Class’s PII/PHI in a vulnerable position—rendering them easy targets for cybercriminals.

So a lot of the allegations are fairly stock allegations following a data breach,but if a situation like this doesn’t settle, what happens when it gets to court? If plaintiffs can’t prove that their information was accessed or acquired, and defendants can’t prove that it wasn’t, then do plaintiffs have standing?  And what might a jury decide if it ever went to trial? Is this where the “in an abundance of caution” language comes into play — where defendants can say that they do not admit any breach but are just being cautious?

 

No related posts.

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Little Rock school district seeks cyberattack disclosure guidance
UK: WHSmith targeted by hackers in cyber attack as company data at risk →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.