DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UPDATE: D.C. Board of Elections data breach contained fewer than 4,000 D.C. voters’ data

Posted on October 18, 2023October 12, 2024 by Dissent

On October 6, DataBreaches reported a breach allegedly containing more than 600,000 lines of data on registered voters in D.C., where, according to the threat actors who listed it, each line represented one voter’s records.

Although there may have been 600k lines of data as previously reported, the D.C. Board of Elections released a statement on October 16 stating that so far, their preliminary forensic investigation in conjunction with the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC)  indicates that there were fewer than 4,000 registered voters from D.C.. The data records are from August 9, 2019 to January 25, 2022 and contain information from voters who participated in DCBOE’s canvass process, which is conducted every oddnumbered year to ensure the voter roll is up-to-date.

DCBOE also confirmed that some DC voter information was accessed through a breach of DataNet Systems’ web server. No internal DCBOE databases or servers were directly compromised.

It’s not yet clear what other data was in the 600k-line data set and whether that data was publicly and freely available or whether any of it was voter data that was supposed to be kept confidential.

New UPDATE DCBOE Voter Data Breach 101623_FINAL
Category: Breach IncidentsGovernment SectorHackOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Inmediata settles multi-state litigation for $1.14 million; will improve data security and breach notification practices
Personal Touch Holding settles NY Attorney General’s lawsuit stemming from 2021 ransomware incident: will pay $350k, improve security →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
  • AI tools collect and store data about you from all your devices – here’s how to be aware of what you’re revealing
  • 23andMe Privacy Ombudsman Urges User Consent Pre-Data Sale

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.