DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

BreachForums back online — or it is a honeypot? (UPDATED)

Posted on June 13, 2024 by Dissent

On June 12, BreachForums reappeared on clearnet and Tor. The owner — or someone with access to the forum owner’s account — interacted a bit in the ShoutBox and posted an announcement:

Hello BreachForums users!

Some wild stuff has gone down recently. First off, Spamhaus has blacklisted our SMTP host. Then, we ran into more issues with our NGINX config. To top it off, our Telegram account (@shinycorp) and the “Jacuzzi 2.0” group got banned and blacklisted. Because of all this, we’re stepping away from using any Telegram account for ShinyHunters, and honestly, it’s kind of sapped our motivation to keep the forum going, though we’ll keep it alive. If you have any questions about rank, escrow, or anything else, hit up @Hollow (likely the next owner). Also, the canary has been updated.

PGP: https://pastebin.com/raw/qUp9Ax9M
PGP Archive Link: https://web.archive.org/web/202109211113…inyHunters

While many were glad to see the site back, ShinyHunters’s announcement claimed that they had lost motivation to keep the site going given all the hassles, and that a current moderator might be the next owner.

But was that really ShinyHunters? Is the forum now a honeypot?

DataBreaches received an interesting note this morning from a reader:

shiny php dismatched his newly signed canary
surely a honeypot now

$ gpg –verify canary.txt
gpg: Signature made Fri May 24 09:28:01 2024 MST
gpg: using RSA key 1FC4D0B1DEE914BB05B57FABF1F1B98A51C989B3
gpg: Good signature from “ShinyHunters” [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 1FC4 D0B1 DEE9 14BB 05B5 7FAB F1F1 B98A 51C9 89B3

$ gpg –verify canary2.txt
gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 12 10:21:59 2024 MST
gpg: using RSA key 828537C15F43F135A8317153CD16A1660CC7CE51
gpg: Can’t check signature: No public key

canary.txt is the older canary from 5/24
canary2.txt is the new canary from 6/12 and DOES NOT MATCH

ShinyHunters:  Get in Touch

@ShinyCorp:  if you happen to read this post, please get in touch.

Update

When a forum user posted about the issue of the mismatch, ShinyHunters responded:

Yes, it’s a mistake from @Hollow
I’ll put my PGP back and we’ll announce a common Staff PGP later.

PGP: https://pastebin.com/raw/qUp9Ax9M
PGP Archive Link: https://web.archive.org/web/202109211113…inyHunters

The canary was then updated and signed by ShinyHunters. 

It appears, then, that ShinyHunters is the same account and PGP key as prior to the takedown of the forum.

The only immediate question is why did so few forum users seem to notice that the canaries didn’t match before they logged in and resumed using the site?

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesOf Note

Post navigation

← You permanently closed your business and then got hit with a ransomware attack. It just doesn’t seem fair, does it?
Insider threat: Months after being fired, former employee accessed company’s computer test system and deleted servers, causing it to lose S$918,000 →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC
  • CISA Alert: Updated Guidance on Play Ransomware
  • Almost one year later, U.S. Dermatology Partners is still not being very transparent about their 2024 breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.