DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

BreachForums back online — or it is a honeypot? (UPDATED)

Posted on June 13, 2024 by Dissent

On June 12, BreachForums reappeared on clearnet and Tor. The owner — or someone with access to the forum owner’s account — interacted a bit in the ShoutBox and posted an announcement:

Hello BreachForums users!

Some wild stuff has gone down recently. First off, Spamhaus has blacklisted our SMTP host. Then, we ran into more issues with our NGINX config. To top it off, our Telegram account (@shinycorp) and the “Jacuzzi 2.0” group got banned and blacklisted. Because of all this, we’re stepping away from using any Telegram account for ShinyHunters, and honestly, it’s kind of sapped our motivation to keep the forum going, though we’ll keep it alive. If you have any questions about rank, escrow, or anything else, hit up @Hollow (likely the next owner). Also, the canary has been updated.

PGP: https://pastebin.com/raw/qUp9Ax9M
PGP Archive Link: https://web.archive.org/web/202109211113…inyHunters

While many were glad to see the site back, ShinyHunters’s announcement claimed that they had lost motivation to keep the site going given all the hassles, and that a current moderator might be the next owner.

But was that really ShinyHunters? Is the forum now a honeypot?

DataBreaches received an interesting note this morning from a reader:

shiny php dismatched his newly signed canary
surely a honeypot now

$ gpg –verify canary.txt
gpg: Signature made Fri May 24 09:28:01 2024 MST
gpg: using RSA key 1FC4D0B1DEE914BB05B57FABF1F1B98A51C989B3
gpg: Good signature from “ShinyHunters” [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 1FC4 D0B1 DEE9 14BB 05B5 7FAB F1F1 B98A 51C9 89B3

$ gpg –verify canary2.txt
gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 12 10:21:59 2024 MST
gpg: using RSA key 828537C15F43F135A8317153CD16A1660CC7CE51
gpg: Can’t check signature: No public key

canary.txt is the older canary from 5/24
canary2.txt is the new canary from 6/12 and DOES NOT MATCH

ShinyHunters:  Get in Touch

@ShinyCorp:  if you happen to read this post, please get in touch.

Update

When a forum user posted about the issue of the mismatch, ShinyHunters responded:

Yes, it’s a mistake from @Hollow
I’ll put my PGP back and we’ll announce a common Staff PGP later.

PGP: https://pastebin.com/raw/qUp9Ax9M
PGP Archive Link: https://web.archive.org/web/202109211113…inyHunters

The canary was then updated and signed by ShinyHunters. 

It appears, then, that ShinyHunters is the same account and PGP key as prior to the takedown of the forum.

The only immediate question is why did so few forum users seem to notice that the canaries didn’t match before they logged in and resumed using the site?

Related posts:

  • The “reincarnation” of BreachForums: A cyberdrama in three acts
  • Confused about the drama with the new BreachForums? Reading this will either help you or make your head spin.
  • Can Exposed[.]vc attract BreachForum’s loyal users? It’s trying to.
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesOf Note

Post navigation

← You permanently closed your business and then got hit with a ransomware attack. It just doesn’t seem fair, does it?
Insider threat: Months after being fired, former employee accessed company’s computer test system and deleted servers, causing it to lose S$918,000 →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.