DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Summit Pathology Laboratories notified 1.8 million patients of a breach. Less than 48 hours later, they were sued. (1)

Posted on October 30, 2024November 2, 2024 by Dissent

On October 18, Summit Pathology and Summit Pathology Laboratories (“Summit”) in Colorado notified HHS of a breach affecting 1,813,538 patients.

By October 21, personal injury law firms started reporting on the breach and recruiting potential plaintiffs.

On October 22, Karen Alexander became aware that Summit had sent her and her family members notifications to their old address.

On October 23, Karen Alexander sued Summit Pathology in Colorado District Court.

There is nothing in her lawsuit complaint that strikes DataBreaches as particularly noteworthy in the allegations or references to HIPAA and the FTC Act, other than her reported frustration that when she contacted Summit’s call center number, they told her they would not mail copies of the notification letters to her new address but they would read her the letter over the phone and she could sign up for complimentary mitigation services.

Alexander does not claim any concrete injury other than suggesting that an uptick in spam starting in April might be connected.

So what happened in this incident and should it be a big deal?

According to Summit’s notification letter,  on or around April 18, 2024, they identified suspicious activity within their computer environment.  The impacted systems reportedly contained demographic and healthcare information, including names, addresses, medical billing and insurance information, certain medical information such as diagnoses, and demographic information such as dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and financial information.

Their letter does not share any details such as how attacker(s) gained access and whether or not it was a ransomware incident or if there was any ransom demand.  As of publication, no ransomware group has claimed responsibility for any attack on them.

There are many questions that have yet to be answered, such as:

  1.  Did Summit have MFA deployed? How did the attacker gain access? Did an employee fall for a phishing or social engineering attack? Did the attacker gain access by using a set of employee credentials that had been compromised in another attack but never reset? What happened?
  2. For how long was the attacker in their system exfiltrating data?
  3. If they did not discover the intrusion or exfiltration quickly, why weren’t they able to?
  4. Why did they have so many patients’ unencrypted data on their system? Were these all current patients?
  5. What additional security measures did they deploy after the breach that could have — or should have — been deployed before any breach to help prevent it? Were they up-to-date on all patches?

DataBreaches submitted an inquiry to Summit, but no reply was immediately available. This post will be updated when more information becomes available.

Update: According to the law firm representing Summit, the Medusa ransomware gang is responsible for the breach, and reportedly gained access via a phishing email.As of November 2, Medusa has yet to claim responsibility for the attack on its leak site.

 


Related:

  • Hackers Say They Have Personal Data of Thousands of NSA and Other Government Officials
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
  • Data BreachesProsper Data Breach Impacts 17.6 Million Accounts
  • Heritage Provider Network $49.99M Class Action Settlement
  • Integris Health Agrees to $30 Million Settlement Over 2023 Data Breach
Category: HackHealth DataHIPAA

Post navigation

← North Korean Group Collaborates with Play Ransomware in Significant Cyber Attack
HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles Ransomware Cybersecurity Investigation for $500,000 →

2 thoughts on “Summit Pathology Laboratories notified 1.8 million patients of a breach. Less than 48 hours later, they were sued. (1)”

  1. Herman Haggleby says:
    November 1, 2024 at 7:22 am

    I also was a victim of this April breach at which time I suddenly started getting an ever increasing amount of phishing emails to what had previously been an email only used for financial and medical info. And YES, there is no question that my supposedly exclusively personal HIPAA information had been breached. Summit knew absolutely in April but said nothing to the victims until October. I had no idea who these people were or the existence of their company and at no point had given them written permission to possess my information. Upon receiving the letter I had to look them up and then to find out how inept they were. Before receiving the letter, I had spent literally a 6 hr day on the phone with Microsoft, speaking to various unintelligible people from who-knows-where while trying to understand what had happened to my email. They did admited that this was a “HUGE” problem and also that I had just purchased an Office 365 contract………which had never happened. This breach goes so deep and yet Summit will skate on any responsibility!

    1. Dissent says:
      November 1, 2024 at 7:52 am

      You’re suggesting your info was used to buy an Office 365 contract? I don’t think I’ve ever heard that before. How was it paid for? Did Summit have your financial info?

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.