DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Hacked on Christmas, DEphoto starts notifying customers, only to be attacked again

Posted on January 1, 2025January 1, 2025 by Dissent

The threat actor known as 0mid16B contacted DataBreaches this morning to alert this site to a breach involving a U.K. photo business, DEphoto (DEphoto[.]biz). DEphoto is an established business for school, sports, club, and event photography.

According to 0mid16B, they attacked DEphoto on December 25, and acquired the personal information of 555,952 customers, 429,597 orders with detailed personal information of 240,307 orders, and 16,213 records with plain text credit card details (full card numbers, expiration dates, and CVV codes). All told, they claim to have exfiltrated hundreds of gigabytes of photos and other data, including the firm’s library of photographs with customers’ children and events photos.

0mid16B provided DataBreaches with a number of unredacted screenshots that appear to have been taken from DEphoto’s network. One screenshot indicates that dephoto[.]bak and dephoto[.]mdf databases with more than 12 GB of data were among the accessed databases. Most screenshots related to customer orders and contained information with names, postal and email addresses, home and mobile telephone numbers, and in the case of people responding to franchise promotions, IP addresses.

Screenshot from database with full credit card numbers in plain text. Numbers and CVV codes redacted by DataBreaches.net

 

A Second Attack Follows Shortly After the First

According to 0mid16B, the first access was directly to the firm’s backend MSSQl server.

0mid16B claims they informed DEphoto on December 25, and that the company allegedly “restored the system” but “did not protect or monitor it.” As a result of their failure to protect the system or to pay the demanded amount, 0mid16B hacked them for a second time on December 29.  The second attack reportedly used the credentials from the DB user login to gain access to the front end.

When asked how much payment they demanded, 0mid16B stated that they managed to talk to the firm’s IT developer on WhatsApp on December 27, at which time, 0mid16B demanded 50,000 GBP ($62,741.16).  There was no response.

DEphoto Notifying Customers

Based on reviews on TrustPilot, it appears the firm quickly began sending out email notifications to affected customers. Entries dated December 28 for “date of experience” report people getting notified and being upset that DEPhoto had retained their information for so long. As one disgruntled person wrote:

You took pictures at my sons football tournament 10 years ago, so why on earth are you still keeping (and now losing) my personal data?

Your own Data Protection Policy states “Data retention:
The company will retain personal data for no longer than is necessary.”
How do you justify keeping my personal data for 10 years for the purchase of a couple of photos?

DEphoto’s privacy policy page was last updated in May, 2018, when GDPR officially took effect.

What’s Next?

0mid16B tells DataBreaches that they will be listing the 500k customer database for sale and will leak the rest of the data for free. Whether they follow through on that remains to be seen.

As of publication time, there is no notice or alert on DEphoto’s website about any incident.

Category: Business SectorHackNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Westend Dental agrees to pay Indiana $350K and to implement corrective action plan to settle charges of multiple HIPAA violations
No need to hack when it’s leaking: Roomster edition (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January
  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit
  • US offering $10 million for info on Iranian hackers behind IOControl malware
  • Sompo Japan Insurance submits improvement plan after info leakage
  • Moreno Valley, Calif., Schools Report Data Breach
  • The Growing Cyber Risks from AI — and How Organizations Can Fight Back
  • UPDATING: Credit Control Corporation denies any current breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.