DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

PowerSchool Faces Suit Over Breach of Student, Teacher Data

Posted on January 13, 2025 by Dissent

Christopher Brown reports:

PowerSchool Holdings Inc. is facing three federal lawsuits alleging the education software provider negligently failed to protect the personal information of students, parents, and teachers that was exposed in a December data breach.

Sheilah Buack-Shelton, Tyler Baker, and Kimberly Kinney alleged in separate complaints that PowerSchool breached its duties under common law, contract law, industry standards, and the Federal Trade Commission Act to implement reasonable and adequate data security measures and provide timely notice of the breach.

Information exposed in the incident includes names, addresses, Social Security numbers, contact information, medical and financial information, student grades and grade-point averages, bus-stop information, and employment information, according to complaints filed Jan. 8-9 in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California.

PowerSchool said in a statement, “While we are not commenting on active litigation, our team is focused on providing affected customers, families, and educators with the resources and support they may need as we work through this together.”

Read more at Bloomberg Law.

The cases are Buack-Shelton v. PowerSchool Holdings Inc., E.D. Cal., No. 2:25-at-00037, complaint filed 1/8/25, Baker v. PowerSchool Holdings Inc., E.D. Cal., No. 2:25-at-00040, complaint filed 1/9/25, and Kinney v. PowerSchool Holdings Inc., E.D. Cal., No. 2:25-at-00042, complaint filed 1/9/25.

Before the data breach litigation, there was already privacy breach litigation

The recent breach has made more people aware that PowerSchool was one of two firms sued last year for allegedly collecting and selling student data without the knowledge or consent of students’ parents.   EdTech Law Center explains:

Nonconsensual student data mining: PowerSchool and IXL Learning

Cherkin, et al. v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc., 3:24cv2706 (N.D. CA) (filed May 6, 2024)

Shanahan, et al. v. IXL Learning, Inc., 3:24cv2724 (N.D. CA) (filed May 7, 2024)

These class-action lawsuits against PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. and IXL Learning, Inc. allege that the defendant companies, through persistent digital surveillance, harvest vast troves of sensitive information from children and their families without their knowledge or consent. The companies are alleged to use that information for commercial purposes in violation of families’ privacy, property, and consumer rights.

The named plaintiffs are the parents of students who have used these platforms, on behalf of themselves and their children. The parents argue that, simply by sending their children to school as the law requires, they do not surrender their rights to know what information private companies are taking from their children and how it will be used—and to decide whether to agree to that collection and use.

Category: Education Sector

Post navigation

← Phishing texts trick Apple iMessage users into disabling protection
Equifax Class Action Settlement 2024 Payment Started, Claimants Getting Paid Via Checks (1) →

2 thoughts on “PowerSchool Faces Suit Over Breach of Student, Teacher Data”

  1. Tina Hatcher says:
    January 15, 2025 at 4:23 pm

    Kids information stolen please fix the problem

  2. Karen Burr says:
    January 15, 2025 at 5:25 pm

    Kids information as well as my information stolen please fix problem and compensate those affected.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ransomware Attack on ADP Partner Exposes Broadcom Employee Data
  • Anne Arundel ransomware attack compromised confidential health data, county says
  • Australian national known as “DR32” sentenced in U.S. federal court
  • Alabama Man Sentenced to 14 Months in Connection with Securities and Exchange Commission X Hack that Spiked Bitcoin Prices
  • Japan enacts new Active Cyberdefense Law allowing for offensive cyber operations
  • Breachforums Boss “Pompompurin” to Pay $700k in Healthcare Breach
  • HHS Office for Civil Rights Settles HIPAA Cybersecurity Investigation with Vision Upright MRI
  • Additional 12 Defendants Charged in RICO Conspiracy for over $263 Million Cryptocurrency Thefts, Money Laundering, Home Break-Ins
  • RIBridges firewall worked. But forensic report says hundreds of alarms went unnoticed by Deloitte.
  • Chinese Hackers Hit Drone Sector in Supply Chain Attacks

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC
  • “We would be less confidential than Google” – Proton threatens to quit Switzerland over new surveillance law
  • CFPB Quietly Kills Rule to Shield Americans From Data Brokers
  • South Korea fines Temu for data protection violations
  • The BR Privacy & Security Download: May 2025

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.