DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Attorney General James Releases Statement on DOGE Access to Sensitive Personal Information

Posted on February 7, 2025February 22, 2025 by Dissent

When DataBreaches said, “Send in the lawyers” to sue Musk, she was thinking of personal injury lawyers who handle data breach litigation. But 14 state attorneys general may be even better. From NYS Attorney General Letitia James:

NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James today led a coalition of 14 attorneys general in releasing the following statement in response to the U.S. Department of the Treasury granting Elon Musk and his so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) staffers access to sensitive payment systems containing Americans’ personally identifiable information:

“In the past week, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has given Elon Musk access to Americans’ personal private information, state bank account data, and other information that is some of our country’s most sensitive data.

“As the richest man in the world, Elon Musk is not used to being told ‘no,’ but in our country, no one is above the law. The President does not have the power to give away our private information to anyone he chooses, and he cannot cut federal payments approved by Congress.

“This level of access for unauthorized individuals is unlawful, unprecedented, and unacceptable. DOGE has no authority to access this information, which they explicitly sought in order to block critical payments that millions of Americans rely on – payments that support health care, childcare, and other essential programs.

“In defense of our Constitution, our right to privacy, and the essential funding that individuals and communities nationwide are counting on, we will be filing a lawsuit to stop this injustice.”

Joining Attorney General James in releasing this statement are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont.

Source:  NYS Attorney General Letitia James

Category: Breach IncidentsGovernment SectorLegislationOf NoteU.S.

Post navigation

← Treasury agrees to block additional DOGE staff from accessing sensitive payment systems
Indiana Man Sentenced to 20 Years in Federal Prison for Conspiracies Involving Cyber Intrusion and a Massive $37 Million Cryptocurrency Theft →

1 thought on “Attorney General James Releases Statement on DOGE Access to Sensitive Personal Information”

  1. Mark Akins says:
    February 13, 2025 at 7:51 am

    The concerns raised by New York Attorney General Letitia James and other officials about the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) seem to misunderstand what DOGE actually does. There’s nothing unusual about the government bringing in people with hacking backgrounds, even some with past convictions. It’s been happening for years. Kevin Mitnick, for example, was once one of the most wanted hackers in the world, but after serving time, he went on to work with government agencies to help strengthen security. Another case is Albert Gonzalez, who worked with the Secret Service before he got caught in a massive credit card theft scheme. Even Adrian Lamo, known for hacking major corporations, later helped authorities in cybersecurity investigations. The government understands that the best way to secure systems is to have people who know how to break them. Also, A big misconception here is that DOGE somehow has dangerous access to sensitive government payment systems. That’s simply not true. DOGE’s access is read-only, meaning they can look at data but can’t change, block, or manipulate anything. Read-only access is standard in audits because it allows investigators to see what’s going on without being able to interfere with operations. The claim that DOGE is trying to stop payments for important programs like healthcare and childcare is misleading. Their job is to make sure the money is being spent the way it’s supposed to be and that taxpayer dollars aren’t being wasted. DOGE has already proven it can find fraud and corruption. In past investigations, they uncovered scams in COVID-19 relief funds, preventing millions of dollars from going to fake claims. They’ve also found “ghost employees” on government payrolls. These are people who were getting paid for jobs they didn’t actually do. In other cases, DOGE exposed misuse of federal grants and caught fraudulent billing in Medicare and Medicaid, saving taxpayers a ton of money. Given all this, it’s strange that some government officials are fighting against oversight. If there’s nothing to hide, then what’s the problem? At the end of the day, the real question is: why wouldn’t we want to audit the government to find fraud and waste? Government accountability is crucial, and making sure money is spent properly helps everyone. If programs like healthcare and childcare are really important, then stopping fraud only makes them stronger by keeping money from being misused. Transparency builds public trust, and preventing oversight makes it seem like there’s something shady going on. DOGE isn’t some secretive group trying to take over government systems, it’s simply doing what every taxpayer should want: making sure their money is being used the right way.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • CoinMarketCap Hacked, Scrambles to Remove Malicious Wallet Verification Popup
  • Montana Attorney General launches investigation into Lee Enterprises data breach
  • AT&T gets preliminary approval for $177 million data breach settlement
  • Aflac notifies SEC of breach suspected to be work of Scattered Spider
  • Former JBLM soldier pleads guilty to attempting to share military secrets with China
  • No, the 16 billion credentials leak is not a new data breach — a wake-up call about fake news (Updated)
  • Tonga’s health system hit by cyberattack (1)
  • Russia Expert Falls Prey to Elite Hackers Disguised as US Officials
  • Proposed class action settlement in In re Netgain Technology litigation
  • Qilin Offers “Call a lawyer” Button For Affiliates Attempting To Extort Ransoms From Victims Who Won’t Pay

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data
  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.