DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Behavioral Health Resources of Washington state updates its data breach disclosure

Posted on April 20, 2025April 19, 2025 by Dissent

On January 17, Behavioral Health Resources (“BHR”) notified the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)  of a reportable breach, but not yet having determined the number affected, they used “501” as a placeholder. They also published a preliminary notice on their website. That notice indicated that on or about November 20, 2024, they had become aware of suspicious activity in their network.

By mid-January, the investigation had not confirmed that any information was actually viewed or exfiltrated, but BHR reported that based on the types of information stored on its system, any information accessed or acquired could have included “full name including maiden name, address, date of birth, Social Security number, telephone and/or fax number, medical record number, health plan beneficiary number, account number, certificate/license number, biometric and/or genetic data, full face photographic image, birth and/or marriage certificate, tribal ID, government-issued ID, taxpayer identification number (TIN), electronic/digital signature, financial institution name, medical billing information, medical information (including diagnosis and/or condition information, treatment information, lab results, provider name, physician, patient ID, medication information, admission date, discharge date, treatment cost information, and date of death), other healthrelated information and incidental health references, and health insurance information.”

On April 17, BHR provided an updated disclosure to the Maine Attorney General’s Office. Still reporting that their investigation could not conclusively determine whether data had actually even been viewed or accessed, they reported that a total of 50,083 people were being notified.

A check of HHS’s public breach tool today still shows the “501” placeholder, so it’s not yet clear whether BHR updated its report to HHS too. No ransomware gang or extortion group has ever publicly claimed responsibility for this incident or leaked data from it.

DataBreaches notes that there was another incident involving another BHR which was Behavioral Health Response in Missouri. That one was hit by INC Ransom, and there is no connection between the two BHR’s.


Related:

  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Hackers Say They Have Personal Data of Thousands of NSA and Other Government Officials
  • UK: 'Catastrophic' attack as Russians hack files on EIGHT MoD bases and post them on the dark web
Category: Breach IncidentsHackHealth DataU.S.

Post navigation

← Breaches Within Breaches: Contractual Obligations After a Security Incident
Chinese Ghost Hackers Hit Hospitals And Factories In America And U.K. →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.