DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Tiffany discloses data breach involving gift cards — second breach disclosure in recent months (1)

Posted on September 17, 2025September 17, 2025 by Dissent

In May, Tiffany & Co. confirmed a data breach affecting an unspecified number of customers in South Korea.  Tiffany is one of LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton’s 75 high-end brands in six different sectors. On May 26, Tiffany Korea emailed select customers to notify them of a cybersecurity breach involving unauthorized access to a vendor platform used for managing customer data. The incident reportedly occurred on April 8, and although the vendor was not named, it seemed likely that this was part of the ShinyHunters Salesforce campaign tracked by Google’s Threat Intelligence Group as UNC6040.

Information provided by a knowledgeable source later informed DataBreaches that LVMH had told law enforcement that they had paid ShinyHunters 4 BTC in response to extortion demands made after attacks on some of its brands that included Dior and Tiffany.

Now Tiffany is reporting a breach involving Tiffany gift cards that affected  2,590 people.

In a notification letter sent to those affected and submitted to the Maine Attorney General’s Office, Tiffany writes that they experienced a cybersecurity incident on or around May 12, 2025.

“Based on our investigation, we determined on September 9, 2025, that, in connection with this issue, an unauthorized party obtained certain information related to your Tiffany gift card(s),” the letter states, adding, “The affected information included client name, postal address, email address, phone number, sales data, internal client reference number, and Tiffany gift card number and PIN.”

Not all of these data elements were affected for each impacted individual.

But was this latest incident report related to the one that affected Tiffany in South Korea or are these two separate incidents? They reportedly occurred more than one month apart. Were they both related to the ShinyHunters’ Salesforce campaign?

DataBreaches contacted ShinyHunters over Telegram to ask whether the Tiffany gift card breach was by ShinyHunters, and whether it was part of the same breach affecting Tiffany’s South Korean customers. ShinyHunters declined to comment.

DataBreaches emailed and called LVMH to request clarification as to whether the two reports were from one incident or two separate incidents and whether one or both incidents were part of the ShinyHunters Salesforce campaign. No reply has been received by this publication.

Update:  According to the Globe and Mail, an unspecified number of Canadian residents were also notified of the breach. Apparently, they couldn’t get a response, either, from LVMH:

Tiffany & Co. and LVMH did not respond to multiple requests for comment about the scale of the breach or measures taken to protect customer data. A spokesperson for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Vito Pilieci, said it is aware of the incident and is “actively engaged” in ensuring that the company is taking the necessary steps to protect Canadians’ personal information.


Related:

  • Now it's Tiffany: Another LVMH luxury brand hit by hackers
  • Are Scattered Spider and ShinyHunters one group or two? And who did France arrest? (1)
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorHackSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Self-propagating supply chain attack hits 187 npm packages
ShinyHunters claims 1.5 billion Salesforce records stolen in Drift hacks →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • Eurofiber admits crooks swiped data from French unit after cyberattack
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • French agency Pajemploi reports data breach affecting 1.2M people
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (1)
  • Surveillance tech provider Protei was hacked, its data stolen, and its website defaced
  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • Keeping Cool When ICE Arrives: Basic Raid Response Strategies for Laboratories
  • IRS Accessed Massive Database of Americans Flights Without a Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.