DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

California’s New Delete Request Tool Impacts Data Brokers and Residents

Posted on October 9, 2025 by Dissent

Going forward, this might help California residents reduce the chances of their personal information being caught up in some breaches. 

Hunton Andrews Kurth writes:

On September 26, 2025, following a public comment period, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) adopted its regulations concerning the Delete Request and Opt-Out Platform (“DROP”). The DROP is a tool developed to address the California Delete Act’s requirement that the CPPA establish an accessible deletion mechanism to allow consumers to request from registered data brokers the deletion of all non-exempt personal information related to the consumer through a single deletion request to the CPPA.

Under the Delete Act, the tool will be available to consumers by January 1, 2026. Starting August 1, 2026, data brokers must access the DROP system every 45 days to retrieve and process deletion requests. Data brokers should review the CPPA’s Final Statement of Reasons and Update to Informative Digest to prepare for compliance with their obligations under the Delete Act.

Read more at Privacy & Information Security Law Blog.

Category: LegislationState/LocalU.S.

Post navigation

← Shad White’s office finds nearly a third of Mississippi’s state agencies fail cybersecurity requirements
Vn: Major hospitals hit by cyberattacks, patient data sold on hacker forums →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
  • Gates Down: Third Circuit Says Breaking Employer Computer Access Policies Is Not Hacking
  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
  • HIPAA, but for non-Covered Entities?
  • Manassas City Public Schools close on Monday due to cyberattack
  • San Joaquin County Superior Court concludes sensitive info leaked in data breach
  • NCCIA arrests man over massive data breach involving millions of Pakistanis
  • Defense Contractors Are Silencing Their Cybersecurity Watchdogs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.