DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Missing Risk Analysis Cost NY CPA Firm $175K—But Not the Big Group Whose Data Was Breached in 2019

Posted on October 9, 2025 by Dissent

Theresa Defino reports:

Covered entities (CEs) and business associates (BAs) might be forgiven if the most recent HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) HIPAA enforcement action evoked little more than a yawn. Yes, the $175,000 payment isn’t a particularly large amount, and the sole alleged violation is a retread. Actually, it’s the 10th in OCR’s Risk Analysis Initiative, and at least the 15th to have involved ransomware.

But the settlement has some unusual aspects, RPP has learned—not the least of which is the BA at issue is an accounting firm, an apparent first for OCR. In addition, Community Care Physicians (CCP) of New York had nothing but nice things to say to RPP about BST & Co. CPAs LLP, the firm whose protected health information (PHI) was breached in 2019. The fact that the two never broke up offers a plethora of compliance lessons in an era where most believe it’s a question of when not if a breach will happen, and so they’re likely to face the same dilemma.

Read more at JDSupra

This article originally appeared in Report on Patient Privacy 25, no. 9 (September, 2025)


Related:

  • HHS OCR Settles HIPAA Ransomware Security Rule Investigation with BST & Co. CPAs, LLP
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth DataHIPAASubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Discord Confirms 70,000 Government IDs Exposed in Third-Party Breach
SonicWall Says All Firewall Backups Were Accessed by Hackers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
  • Gates Down: Third Circuit Says Breaking Employer Computer Access Policies Is Not Hacking
  • Short-term renewal of cyber information sharing law appears in bill to end shutdown
  • Yanluowang ransomware IAB pleads guilty
  • Lawsuit Alleges Ex-Intel Employee Hid 18,000 Sensitive Documents Prior to Leaving the Company
  • HIPAA, but for non-Covered Entities?
  • Manassas City Public Schools close on Monday due to cyberattack
  • San Joaquin County Superior Court concludes sensitive info leaked in data breach
  • NCCIA arrests man over massive data breach involving millions of Pakistanis
  • Defense Contractors Are Silencing Their Cybersecurity Watchdogs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map
  • EPIC Publishes New Whitepaper Detailing Privacy Risks of Government Data Mining Programs
  • Modern cars are spying on you. Here’s what you can do about it.

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.