DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

Posted on November 11, 2025 by Dissent

Courtney Kube reports:

An Army gynecologist took secret intimate videos of a patient under his care at Fort Hood in Texas, according to a lawsuit filed Monday.

The lawsuit says that the woman is believed to be one of scores who were preyed upon by Dr. Blaine McGraw and that Army leadership had allowed him to continue practicing despite receiving sexual misconduct complaints dating back years.

“By doing so, the Army gave cover to a predator in uniform,” says the lawsuit, which was filed in Bell County District Court.

McGraw has been suspended and is under investigation by the Army Criminal Investigation Division, or CID, according to a statement on Fort Hood’s media center website. It said “potentially affected patients” would be contacted by the investigators.

At least 25 women have been contacted by Army criminal investigators after they found photos and videos on McGraw’s electronic devices showing female body parts, a military official told NBC News. The lawsuit says the allegations against McGraw also include inappropriate touching, crude remarks and performing unnecessary procedures.

Read more at NBC.

Related: U.S. Army Fort Hood Statement of October 28, 2025

Fort Hood suspends medical provider, opens investigation

October 28, 2025 – 2:03 pm

FORT HOOD, TEXAS – A Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center (CRDAMC) medical provider has been suspended from his position and is no longer providing services to patients. The Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) began an investigation within hours of a patient’s allegations against this former medical provider. Fort Hood and CRDAMC are committed to providing world-class care to our Soldiers, Families, and beneficiaries, with patient safety and trust as the cornerstone of our mission.

Fort Hood officials are additionally contacting all patients seen by the provider during the provider’s tenure at CRDAMC, even if there is currently no indication to believe they have been affected by the alleged misconduct currently under investigation. These individuals will be provided with a number for a dedicated CRDAMC call center to answer their questions and provide additional resources should they need them.

Potentially affected patients are being contacted by Army CID. If further notification is required, Army CID investigators will contact individuals directly.

We understand patients may feel distressed and anxious about this issue, and we encourage beneficiaries to contact CRDAMC for additional questions.

The matter remains under ongoing investigation, and the subject is presumed innocent unless proven guilty. Fort Hood officials are unable to provide additional information at this time on any specifics involved to protect the integrity of the investigation and the privacy of those who may be affected.

Category: Government SectorHealth DataInsiderU.S.

Post navigation

← The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers
  • South Korea police raid e-commerce giant Coupang over data leak; govt schedules hearing
  • FinCEN Report: Reported Ransomware Incidents and Payments Reached All-Time High in 2023
  • Leavenworth, Kansas cyberattack disrupts city services
  • They’ve escaped a lot of media attention, but Anubis RaaS is a threat to the medical sector (1)
  • “In the most expedient time possible…”
  • Portugal updates cybercrime law to exempt security researchers
  • LockBit 5’s “new secure blog domain” infra leaked already

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.