DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

Posted on November 12, 2025 by Dissent

Julia Dowling reports:

The Court of Appeal has reaffirmed the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) bears responsibility for an unauthorised disclosure of confidential data to the investigative website ‘OffshoreAlert’.

The decision marks the latest development in a long-running legal battle over accountability and data protection standards within Malta’s financial regulator.

This latest judgment, delivered on Wednesday, builds on an earlier ruling in May 2024, which had confirmed that the MFSA was responsible for leaking information about the licence cancellation of E&S Consultancy Ltd before officially notifying the company and its directors, Christian Ellul and Karl Schranz.

In its renewed appeal, the MFSA sought to overturn the decision of the Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal, arguing that the tribunal had acted ultra vires and relied on a forensic expert who exceeded his remit.

The regulator also claimed that the alleged disclosure did not amount to a “personal data breach” within the meaning of EU Regulation.

Read more at Malta Today.

The reporting doesn’t indicate what costs or penalties the regulator must pay.

Category: ExposureFinancial SectorGovernment SectorNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach. (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Village of Golf Manor considering paying ransom amid cyberattack (1)
  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.