DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Attleboro investigating ‘cybersecurity incident’ impacting city’s IT systems

Posted on November 21, 2025 by Dissent

Marc Fortier reports:

City officials and police in Attleboro, Massachusetts, say they are investigating a “cybersecurity incident” that has taken several of the city’s information technology systems offline.

“City leaders are working with cybersecurity specialists, the city’s insurer and state and federal partners to identify the cause and begin restoring services,” the city said in a statement Thursday afternoon.

Public safety services remain operational, and the police said residents should continue to call 911 for any emergencies. For non-emergency needs, they said residents can call the police department business line at 508-223-2950 or the fire department business line at 508-399-8693.

All other phone lines to the City of Attleboro and the Attleboro Police Department are not functioning. Additionally, email service is down citywide, affecting all employees and departments.

Read more at NBC Boston.

As of publication, no group seems to have publicly claimed responsibility for the attack.

Category: Government SectorU.S.

Post navigation

← Fired techie admits sabotaging ex-employer, causing $862K in damage
Two suspected Scattered Spider hackers plead not guilty over Transport for London cyberattack →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Teen who allegedly stole millions of personal data records arrested in Spain
  • Akira ransomware: FBI tallies 250 million in payouts
  • IE: HSE confirms second ransomware attack but ‘no evidence’ patient data was stolen
  • Examining impact of federal relief program after major healthcare cyberattack — Research Brief
  • Justice Department Announces Actions to Combat Two Russian State-Sponsored Hacking Groups
  • Should entities be required to disclose the name of a vendor if the breach was at the vendor’s?
  • The Hidden Risks of Information Disclosure: A Costly Lesson from Cornwall
  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • U.S. Plans to Scrutinize Foreign Tourists’ Social Media History
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: EFF Launches Age Verification Hub as Resource Against Misguided Laws
  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.