DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS

Posted on December 2, 2025December 2, 2025 by Dissent

After posting something about a new report on cbsecurity[.]net by Dos-OP on Nova RaaS, Nova contacted me to complain, dispute the claims, and accuse me of being an unprofessional journalist. Once they made contact, I told him I would forward his criticisms to Dos-OP for their response, even though, as Dos-OP pointed out to me, Nova should have been thrilled if the report really was inaccurate, because it would misdirect people looking for them.

But Dos-OP duly answered questions I sent them and provided screenshots or other proof, some of which I am not free to share at this time. They agreed with one criticism, and did not provide any hard proof on a second point, but provided screenshots and other evidence for the other claims, including Nova’s attempt to claim that certain IP addresses were not associated with them.

The post has now been updated with Nova’s claims and Dos-OP’s responses. You can read it all from the original post/beginning at https://databreaches.net/2025/11/30/breaking-dos-op-exposes-the-nova-raas-gang/

The second part of Dos-OP’s report on Nova is anticipated to be released in 10 days or so. Dos-OP informs me that some information has already been sent to law enforcement in a few countries.

 


Related:

  • Dos-Op exposes the Nova RaaS gang (2)
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesMalware

Post navigation

← KR: Privacy Commissioner’s Office Urges the Public to Beware of Fraudsters Exploiting the Tai Po Fire Disaster
Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping? →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Defense Bill Would Require New Cyber Requirements for Some DoD Telecom Contracts
  • Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you — Trumbull County, Ohio edition (1)
  • US Posts $10 Million Bounty for Iranian Hackers
  • South Korea police raid e-commerce giant Coupang over data leak; govt schedules hearing
  • FinCEN Report: Reported Ransomware Incidents and Payments Reached All-Time High in 2023
  • Leavenworth, Kansas cyberattack disrupts city services
  • They’ve escaped a lot of media attention, but Anubis RaaS is a threat to the medical sector (1)
  • “In the most expedient time possible…”
  • Portugal updates cybercrime law to exempt security researchers
  • LockBit 5’s “new secure blog domain” infra leaked already

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC Denies Petition from SpyFone App CEO to Vacate 2021 Order
  • Privacy concerns raised as Grok AI found to be a stalker’s best friend
  • PRIVACY—S.D. Cal.: Employee did not waive privacy right in personal email data on company provided laptop, (Dec 5, 2025)
  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.