DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Treasury cancels $21 million in Booz Allen contracts, blaming a breach that happened years ago

Posted on January 27, 2026 by Dissent

CNN reports:

The Treasury Department cut ties with Booz Allen Hamilton on Monday and announced that it was canceling $21 million in federal contracts with the consulting giant because one of its ex-employees previously leaked President Donald Trump’s tax returns to the press.

A statement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent referenced Charles Littlejohn, a onetime Booz employee who is now serving a five-year prison term for stealing tax return information on Trump and other wealthy Americans while contracting at the IRS.

“President Trump has entrusted his cabinet to root out waste, fraud, and abuse, and canceling these contracts is an essential step to increasing Americans’ trust in government,” Bessent said in the statement. “Booz Allen failed to implement adequate safeguards to protect sensitive data, including the confidential taxpayer information it had access to through its contracts with the Internal Revenue Service.”

A Booz Allen spokesperson disputed some of Bessent’s claims in a statement to CNN.

Read more at CNN.

COMMENT: CNN’s headline actually reads, “Treasury cancels $21 million in Booz Allen contracts, blaming Trump tax return leak,” but  Bessent’s statement never mentions the President or the fact that his data had been leaked in the incident. CNN seems to be leaping to the suspicion or connecting dots that might lead cynical people to consider that the cancellation is revenge for the fact that the President’s data had been leaked at the time.

Having a data breach or leak that reveals inadequate security against insider wrongdoing where the contractor’s employee leaked data on approximately 400,000 taxpayers might be justification enough for not renewing or canceling the contract at that time. But Littlejohn pleaded guilty in 2023 and was sentenced two years ago to five years in prison for his crime. What has Booz Allen done since that incident to prevent future incidents of that kind?

Is the government going to cancel every contract where there has been an insider wrongdoing breach in the past, or is it only going to cancel the ones that personally affected the President?

Why is Treasury really first canceling its contract with Booz Allen now?

 

 


Related:

  • Imprisoned IRS Contractor Leaked Information of Over 400,000 Taxpayers
  • Wealthy Taxpayers Alerted to Leaked Data Years After IRS Breach
  • Ex-IRS contractor who leaked Trump’s tax returns sentenced to 5 years
  • IRS consultant charged in leak of tax returns for Trump, wealthy Americans
  • Ringleader of $24 Million Stolen Identity Tax Refund Fraud Ring Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison
Category: Breach IncidentsInsiderSubcontractor

Post navigation

← Savannah Best Buy employee says ‘hacker group’ blackmailed him into theft ring scheme
AI “digital helper” Lena Health breach exposed some Houston Methodist patients’ medical info (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • 45,000 malicious IP addresses taken down in international cyber operation
  • The Broken Records: tracing the human cost of the 2022 British MoD leak
  • Telus Digital confirms breach after ShinyHunters claims 1 petabyte data theft
  • China’s CERT warns OpenClaw can inflict nasty wounds
  • Bell Ambulance data breach impacted over 238,000 people
  • Lotte Card fined 9.6 billion won for leaking users’ social registration numbers
  • Handala claims responsibility for attack on medical device maker Stryker
  • Police Scotland fined £66k for extracting and sharing mobile phone data
  • The rise of teen hackers ‘makes for a good headline’, but cyber crime activities peak later in life
  • Viral ‘Quittr’ Porn Addiction App Exposed the Masturbation Habits of Hundreds of Thousands of Users

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • New data shows increase in FBI searches of Americans’ data last year
  • CalPrivacy Fines PlayOn Sports $1.1 Million for CCPA Violations Involving Student Privacy
  • 17 States Sues Trump Administration Over Unlawful Data Demands Targeting Colleges
  • Privacy watchdogs sound alarm over US bid to get travellers’ social media
  • Petition filed over misuse of protesters’ data by Kenyan government and telcos

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: Dissent.73

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.