DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Investigation into data breach involving Blue Cross Blue Shield members could head to court

Posted on January 30, 2026 by Dissent

Jonathon Ambarian provides an update on a breach previously reported on DataBreaches.net:

In October, MTN reported on a major data breach involving customers with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana. Now, as a state investigation into the breach continues, the next steps could be playing out in court.

BCBSMT, the largest health insurance provider in Montana, said in October that up to 462,000 of its members’ data may have been exposed by a “cyber incident” affecting Conduent, a third-party vendor. The company reported the incident to Montana State Auditor James Brown’s office, which launched an investigation.

Now, BCBSMT is arguing the auditor’s actions have been unlawful. The company filed a lawsuit in state district court in Helena, claiming Brown’s office doesn’t have the authority to pursue an investigation.

Read more at KXLH

The legal issue seems fairly straightforward: Montana passed a law that went into effect on October 1, 2025 that would require entities to report breaches to the state auditor. Previously, entities like BCBS that are covered by HIPAA were exempt under state notification law if they complied with HIPAA’s breach notification rule and requirements.

The insurer learned about the breach on July 1, 2025 from Conduent, and concluded its own investigation into the incident on September 23. They notifed the state auditor after October 1, but claim they considered that a courtesy notification as the breach had occurred before October 1.

DataBreaches notes that when we first reported on this incident on October 22, 2025, we had found no entry on HHS’s public breach tool from BCBSMT or Conduent, although there was a much smaller report from Conduent Business Services on October 8, 2025. As of publication today, we still do not see any entry on HHS’s public breach tool from BCBSMT or Conduent. If BCBSMT wants to argue that they were still under the exemption for HIPAA-regulated entities that comply with the Breach Notification Rule, where is the evidence that they did comply by notifying HHS timely of the breach?

Was BCBSMT obligated under the new Montana law to report the incident to the state auditor if those affected had not been notified before October 1, 2025 (if they weren’t)? We will have to wait to learn what the court rules.


Related:

  • TeamGhostShell posts "master list" of 548 leaks (so far)
  • Blue Cross Blue Shield Association to offer all members nationwide free identity theft protection service
  • Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton Demands Infor­ma­tion from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and Con­duent as Part of Inves­ti­ga­tion into Largest Data Breach in U.S. History
  • Blue Cross of Idaho Notice of Privacy Breach
  • Attorney General James Secures $14.2 Million from Car Insurance Companies Over Data Breaches
Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesHealth DataSubcontractor

Post navigation

← SK Telecom rejects consumer agency’s compensation settlement over personal data leak
BD: 14,000 journos’ personal data leaked online →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • 45,000 malicious IP addresses taken down in international cyber operation
  • The Broken Records: tracing the human cost of the 2022 British MoD leak
  • Telus Digital confirms breach after ShinyHunters claims 1 petabyte data theft
  • China’s CERT warns OpenClaw can inflict nasty wounds
  • Bell Ambulance data breach impacted over 238,000 people
  • Lotte Card fined 9.6 billion won for leaking users’ social registration numbers
  • Handala claims responsibility for attack on medical device maker Stryker
  • Police Scotland fined £66k for extracting and sharing mobile phone data
  • The rise of teen hackers ‘makes for a good headline’, but cyber crime activities peak later in life
  • Viral ‘Quittr’ Porn Addiction App Exposed the Masturbation Habits of Hundreds of Thousands of Users

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • New data shows increase in FBI searches of Americans’ data last year
  • CalPrivacy Fines PlayOn Sports $1.1 Million for CCPA Violations Involving Student Privacy
  • 17 States Sues Trump Administration Over Unlawful Data Demands Targeting Colleges
  • Privacy watchdogs sound alarm over US bid to get travellers’ social media
  • Petition filed over misuse of protesters’ data by Kenyan government and telcos

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: Dissent.73

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: Dissent.73
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.