DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Hong Kong regulator issues investigative report on 2021 Fotomax ransomware incident

Posted on November 14, 2022 by Dissent

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD) in Hong Kong published an investigation report today concerning a ransomware attack on the database of Fotomax (F.E.) Limited. From the news release:

The investigation arose from a data breach notification lodged by Fotomax with the PCPD on 1 November 2021, which reported that the database of its online store (the Database) had been attacked by ransomware and maliciously encrypted on 26 October 2021. A total of 544,862 members and 73,957 customers who had ordered products and/or accepted services from its online store between 16 November 2020 and 26 October 2021 were affected in the incident.

From the evidence collected in the investigation, the Privacy Commissioner finds that Fotomax had the following serious deficiencies which contributed to the avoidable exploitation of a vulnerability and access to personal data in the Database by the hacker:

  • Misevaluation of security vulnerability risk;
  • Deficiencies in information system management; and
  • Procrastinated implementation of multi-factor authentication.

In the present case, the Privacy Commissioner finds that Fotomax had serious deficiencies in risk awareness and personal data security measures which led to the ransomware attack on the Database. The Privacy Commissioner considers that Fotomax had not taken all practicable steps to ensure that the personal data involved was protected from unauthorised or accidental access, processing, erasure, loss or use, thereby contravening DPP 4(1) concerning the security of personal data under the PDPO. The Privacy Commissioner has issued an Enforcement Notice to Fotomax, directing Fotomax to remedy and prevent recurrence of the contravention.

You can download “Investigation Report: Ransomware Attack on the Database of Fotomax (F.E.) Limited:” at  https://www.pcpd.org.hk/english/enforcement/commissioners_findings/files/r22_18947_e.pdf


Related:

  • How a hacking gang held Italy’s political elites to ransom
  • Uncovering Qilin attack methods exposed through multiple cases
  • Predatory Sparrow Strikes: Coordinated Cyberattacks Seek to Cripple Iran's Critical Infrastructure
  • Ex-CISA head thinks AI might fix code so fast we won't need security teams
  • On Reports of an Alleged Data Breach Involving G-Xchange, Inc. (GCash)
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
Category: Business SectorCommentaries and AnalysesMalwareNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation notifies employees of insider breach
Mass Email Extortion Campaign Claims Server Hack; Tries to Extort Troy Hunt →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.