DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Cyber attacks set to become ‘uninsurable’, says Zurich chief

Posted on December 26, 2022 by Dissent

Ian Smith reports:

The chief executive of one of Europe’s biggest insurance companies has warned that cyber attacks, rather than natural catastrophes, will become “uninsurable” as the disruption from hacks continues to grow. Insurance executives have been increasingly vocal in recent years about systemic risks, such as pandemics and climate change, that test the sector’s ability to provide coverage. For the second year in a row, natural catastrophe-related claims are expected to top $100bn.  But Mario Greco, chief executive at insurer Zurich, told the Financial Times that cyber was the risk to watch.

Read more at FT.

The question of “what would happen if…” has been a frequent topic of concern and debate. While the FT article mentions insurers trying to limit their payouts by excluding attacks by “state actors” or “warlike acts,” there’s also the issue whether eliminating cyberinsurance would actually reduce the number of attacks. Would groups only attack those who have insurance to pay ransom, or wouldn’t it make a difference?

From what this blogger has seen, lack of insurance does not reduce the likelihood of an entity becoming a victim in the k-12 education sector. How many school districts have we seen that were hit and did not have any cyberinsurance to pay any ransom demands or just refused to pay ransom?  Vice Society even told this blogger that the absence of cyberinsurance is not a factor for them or deterrent, and when asked about one of their recent attacks on a k-12 district, a Hive spokesperson told this blogger that they had no idea whether the victim had cyberinsurance to pay as they hadn’t checked. So maybe that approach is not likely to be as effective as some might hope.

Will prohibiting ransom payments make a difference? From what Vice Society and Hive have said, it is unlikely to reduce attacks on k-12 entities. And what it might do is result in a situation where highly sensitive student records just get dumped on the internet. Do we really want to tell districts that they cannot pay to try to prevent that?

Making ransomware attacks uninsurable may save insurers some profits, but how would it help improve security in the k-12 or secondary education sector?

 


Related:

  • North Country Healthcare responds to Stormous's claims of a breach
  • Gladney Adoption Center had serious data exposures in the past few months. What will they do to prevent more?
  • 70% of healthcare cyberattacks result in delayed patient care, report finds
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation Sector

Post navigation

← Vanuatu ransomware attack claimed by RansomHouse
Vendor Claims to Have Scraped 400M Twitter User Records (with UPDATE 1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Clorox Files $380M Suit Alleging Cognizant Gave Hackers Passwords in Catastrophic 2023 Cyberattack
  • Cyberattacks Paralyze Major Russian Restaurant Chains
  • France Travail: At least 340,000 job seekers victims of new hack
  • Legal Silence and Chilling Effects: Injunctions Against the Press in Cybersecurity
  • #StopRansomware: Interlock
  • Suspected XSS Forum Admin Arrested in Ukraine
  • PowerSchool commits to strengthened breach measures following engagement with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  • Hungarian police arrest suspect in cyberattacks on independent media
  • Two more entities have folded after ransomware attacks
  • British institutions to be banned from paying ransoms to Russian hackers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Meta Denies Tracking Menstrual Data in Flo Health Privacy Trial
  • Wikipedia seeks to shield contributors from UK law targeting online anonymity
  • British government reportedlu set to back down on secret iCloud backdoor after US pressure
  • Idaho agrees not to prosecute doctors for out-of-state abortion referrals
  • As companies race to add AI, terms of service changes are going to freak a lot of people out. Think twice before granting consent!
  • Uganda orders Google to register as a data-controller within 30 days after landmark privacy ruling
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg reach settlement to end $8 billion trial over Facebook privacy violations

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.