DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Over a Third of All Data Breaches in Germany Are the Result of Errors by External Partners

Posted on April 14, 2010 by Dissent

In 2009 German companies had to invest more than they did only a year ago when they suffered a data breach with subsequent data abuse. More and more frequently the source of the error leading to violation of data protection is not in the company’s own building but on the premises of external providers who are processing or using company data on the company’s behalf. These are the results of the ‘Jahresstudie 2009: Kosten von Datenpannen’ [“2009 Annual Study: Cost of a Data Breach”], which examines the financial consequences of data loss and abuse in German companies with reference to real-life data.

The study, for the second time carried out by Ponemon Institute and supported by PGP Corporation, is based not on hypothetical assumptions but on the actual facts and figures resulting from data breaches and subsequent cases of data abuse in 22 German companies. The data breaches covered by this study range from cases of fewer than 3,300 data records affected to cases of around 63,000 data records. Data from a total of twelve different industries was covered, the emphasis being on quantifying the direct and indirect costs and the subsequent expenditure arising from loss or theft of personal data, using objective measurement criteria.

Read more of the press release here.


Related:

  • Two years after an audit highlighted significant concerns, North Salem Central School District leaves sensitive student data at risk
  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • How many courts have had sealed and sensitive files exposed by one vendor's error?
  • Legal Aid Agency chief admits difficulties understanding impact of cyberattack
  • The 4TB time bomb: when EY's cloud went public (and what it taught us)
  • Some lower-tier ransomware gangs have formed a new RaaS alliance -- or have they? (1)
Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← More than 200 FFD workers warned personal info may be compromised
Almost Half of Disclosed Breaches Do Not Include Number of Records Compromised →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.