DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NJ: The Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Center discloses July attack by Meow Leaks

Posted on September 16, 2024 by Dissent

On September 6, The Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Center posted a substitute notice on its website about an incident in July that affected patients at their New Jersey and New York locations.

The attack by Meow Leaks reportedly resulted in the threat actors accessing some protected health information (PHI) of an undisclosed number of patients. The PHI included name and one or more of the following: address, phone number, email address, date of birth, Social Security number, drivers license/state ID number, credit/debit card number, treatment/diagnosis information, prescription information, provider name, medical record number, date of service, patient ID, Medicare/Medicaid number, treatment cost information, health insurance policy number, health insurance claim number, and health insurance information.

PMRC notes that it notified law enforcement and is offering those affected access to credit monitoring and identity protection services as an added precaution.  Employee data was also included in this breach.

What its notice doesn’t mention is that the threat actors did more than just “access” PHI. They removed a copy of some data– allegedly 40 GB of files with PHI and PII, some of which they leaked as proof when PMRC did not pay their demands.

SuspectFile has a lot more information about this incident and was given exclusive access to review some of the files Meow Leaks acquired. They were also shown some of the negotiations between PMRC and Meow Leaks,  emails that reveal that PMRC was also contacted by impostors who claimed to be the attackers and attempted to get PMRC to pay them.

Somewhat surprisingly, the ransom demand was $15,000, but PMRC did not pay even that relatively small amount.

Their refusal to pay ransom is commendable from the perspective that we don’t want to reinforce and encourage more attacks, but how will PMRC’s patients react if they learn that their sensitive personal information leaked on the internet or was sold to other criminals because their doctors wouldn’t pay $15,000 to protect their data from disclosure? Of course, there is no guarantee that criminals will really keep their word about deleting data if they are paid, but how will patients react to this, and if there is a potential class action lawsuit, what will that cost the practice financially and in goodwill or trust?

As of publication, the data are for sale on the dark web. If someone want to be the sole purchaser, the price is $15,000.  If the sale is nonexclusive, the price is $5,000. It is not clear what will happen if there are no purchasers.

Read more at SuspectFile.

 

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth Data

Post navigation

← WI: Richland County government under fire for 2023 data breach (1)
Everything old is new again? MCNA Dental allegedly suffers second big data breach of PHI →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • B.C. health authority faces class-action lawsuit over 2009 data breach (1)
  • Private Industry Notification: Silent Ransom Group Targeting Law Firms
  • Data Breach Lawsuits Against Chord Specialty Dental Partners Consolidated
  • PA: York County alerts residents of potential data breach
  • FTC Finalizes Order with GoDaddy over Data Security Failures
  • Hacker steals $223 million in Cetus Protocol cryptocurrency heist
  • Operation ENDGAME strikes again: the ransomware kill chain broken at its source
  • Mysterious Database of 184 Million Records Exposes Vast Array of Login Credentials
  • Mysterious hacking group Careto was run by the Spanish government, sources say
  • 16 Defendants Federally Charged in Connection with DanaBot Malware Scheme That Infected Computers Worldwide

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • D.C. Federal Court Rules Termination of Democrat PCLOB Members Is Unlawful
  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says
  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.