DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Oracle’s statement to customers is still raising questions about its disclosure and transparency

Posted on April 9, 2025 by Dissent

Today’s reminder to “Tell the truth, or someone will tell it for you,”  courtesy of Kevin Beaumont:

Oracle have finally issued to a written notification to customers about their cybersecurity incident. They are again wordsmithing. OCI is a different org unit in Oracle to Oracle Classic – they’re denying a different scope.

Oracle’s communication to customers, with comments by Beaumont.

Kevin also commented:

How long was the attacker in the SaaS solution (that Oracle manage)? What did they do with the access? How long were they in for? Why were ‘legacy’ systems containing customer info left unmanaged and insecure? Etc. An exceptionally poor response for a company who manage extremely sensitive data.

Beaumont has been all over Oracle’s incident response and claims since the beginning. You can read his thread for earlier comments.

Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← CISA, experts warn of Crush file transfer attacks after a controversial disclosure
Pulse Urgent Care Center appears to be the victim of a ransomware attack →

1 thought on “Oracle’s statement to customers is still raising questions about its disclosure and transparency”

  1. Homey D Klown says:
    April 9, 2025 at 6:01 pm

    As a long-time OCI customer the BS/Reality-Distortion-Field being put up on Oracle is comically awful. The public stance is “nothing to see here!!!” while existing clients are ratting them out for ‘fessing up to the breach.

    Maybe a giant hit on share price, market share or defecting customers will snap them out of their cyber-fugue?

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Cyberattack pushes German napkin company into insolvency
  • WMATA Train Operators Arrested in Health Care Fraud Scheme
  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.