DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Why we shouldn’t just repeat ransomware groups’ claims, Sunday edition

Posted on August 3, 2025 by Dissent

Some data leaks are not what you might expect from their listing on a dark web leak site.

Today’s example is courtesy of a ransomware group that listed a medical practice on its leak site and then published the data.

Because it was a medical practice, DataBreaches started to inspect the data tranche.

To my surprise, there was no patient data.

Nor were there any office files or internal files for the named medical practice.

The entire data dump appeared to be from a tax preparation service in another state.  The folder was called “LACERTE CLIENTS.” Lacerte is a tax software firm that markets Lacerte tax software. Its parent company is Intuit. Files in the leak included files going back to 2011 and up to 2024 for some named clients.  DataBreaches did not examine all files, and did not spot any complete federal or state tax returns, but saw related forms, mileage forms, filing instructions for clients, and invoices for services the tax preparer had provided.

On July 25, DataBreaches called Dennis Horton, the tax preparer in Tustin, California  whose name and address appeared on all of the files. Because his outgoing message indicated that he was away on vacation but would return the next day, DataBreaches left a detailed voicemail. The voicemail did not include the URL of the leak (who is going to read a lengthy onion address into a voicemail, right?) but left this site’s name and phone number.

Mr. Horton never called back.

On July 27, DataBreaches emailed him and repeated the message, this time sending him the names of some of his clients and their client number and the type of filings he had prepared for them.

Mr. Horton never replied.

Perhaps Dennis Horton of Dennis Horton Tax Services already knew he had been hacked or had a data security incident. Perhaps he already investigated and decided no clients needed to be notified. Then again, perhaps he didn’t.

DataBreaches also left a message for the ransomware group on their Tox asking them if they had just misattributed the leak to the wrong entity or if the tax data really was on the server for the medical practice.

They, too, never replied.

Category: Business Sector

Post navigation

← Aftermath: More than 99% of providers opted to have Change Healthcare notify patients of its massive data breach
Are Scattered Spider and ShinyHunters one group or two? And who did France arrest? (1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.