DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Six months after discovering an attack, Northwest Radiologists notifies almost 350,000 Washington State residents

Posted on August 1, 2025 by Dissent

On January 20, 2025 Mt. Baker Imaging and Northwest Radiologists in Washington State (collectively, “Northwest Radiologists”) experienced a network intrusion that they discovered on January 25. Although media reported on the incident on January 27, it was not until March 26 that Northwest Radiologists posted a notice on its website (archived). DataBreaches could find no report on HHS’s public breach tool indicating that Northwest Radiologists has ever reported the incident to them (unless HHS decided not to post it yet).

On July 10, Northwest Radiologists notified Washington State that 348,118 Washington residents were affected by the incident.

A copy of their notification letter to patients referred to the incident as a “network disruption.” Was this a ransomware attack or a hack with an extortion demand, or neither? They don’t say, but no ransomware or extortion gang has claimed responsibility for the incident, and Northwest Radiologists claims, “Please note that we currently have no reason to believe that your information has been or will be misused as a result of this event.”

What Information Was Involved: The types of information that may have been contained within the affected data may include your first and last name, in combination one or more of the following: address information, telephone number, date of birth, email address, Social Security number, driver’s license or state identification card number, treatment or diagnosis information, provider name, medical record number or patient identification number, health insurance information, and/or treatment cost information.

The July letter indicates that those affected are being offered complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection services.

If almost 350,000 Washington residents were affected, how many others outside of the state were also affected? And was this a ransomware attack or an attack with an extortion demand, and if so, did Northwest Radiologists pay? It is now six months since the attack. One would expect data to be leaked already if there was an unpaid demand.

DataBreaches attempted to find email addresses to reach Northwest Radiologists with requests for greater clarity about the incident and their response. The majority of emails bounced back. Others went unanswered.

If DataBreaches obtains more information about the January incident, this post will be updated.

An Earlier, Smaller Breach?

But in the process of seeking contact information, DataBreaches discovered that Northwest Radiologists had another HIPAA breach four years ago when it responded to a patient’s online review.

The review had been posted with the patient’s first and last name. The patient, whose name DataBreaches is not reporting, had amended a bad online review to report an acceptable outcome. But then Northwest Radiologists responded to the patient by name and writing:

Hello, [name]. Mt Baker Imaging and Northwest Radiologists are happy to be able to offer interest free payment plans to any patient of ours that has a balance greater than $75. In reviewing your account, it looks like you would have qualified for this option. It appears that we never heard from you or received payment after mailing statements to the address we have on file for you and this is unfortunately the reason your account is currently in a default status with our collection agency.

Please reach out to our local office at (360) 788-9004 if you’re interested in establishing set payment arrangements and we will work with you to resolve your balance. Thank you!

Once again, for the kids in the back row who slept through the first presentation: even if a patient reveals their own PHI, the provider cnanot publicly reveal PHI to respond to an online review. Their response was tied to a patient’s first and last name and revealed that their account was in collection.

 

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesHealth Data

Post navigation

← As ransomware gangs threaten physical harm, ‘I am afraid of what’s next,’ ex-negotiator says
Palo Alto Networks investigating ransomware threat related to SharePoint exploitation →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.