DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

(follow-up) Private info accidentally released

Posted on July 8, 2010 by Dissent

Fran Handy reports that after the Sparta School District in New Jersey erroneously sent out the unredacted version of a spread sheet containing vendors’ SSN and other information — instead of the redacted one that they had prepared in response to an open records request — the District has had some trouble getting the data back. The unredacted file had been sent to local activist Jesse Wolosky, on June 24, who then:

contacted television and print news media to inform them of the public records violation. He also contacted some of the individuals on the list to say he was in possession of their private information and that it was given to him by the school district.

The district reports that it first became aware of the error on June 29 when they were contacted by media for a statement. The district has reportedly sent 1,800 letters to names on the list informing them of the error. But by last week, the district was still having trouble getting the data back:

On July 2, Ceurvels sent a second request for Wolosky to return the files. As of Tuesday afternoon, he had not done so.

Wolosky said, “Why would I take the risk to e-mail back the files, which include social security numbers, when they could get lost in cyberspace and go to the wrong mailbox? I’m also not deleting the files because I now have state agencies looking into the matter.”

District officials say keeping the information in his computer is unauthorized and could put Wolosky in a position of liability, should the information fall into the wrong hands.

Sparta Police Department’s Public Information Officer Sgt. John Paul Beebe said, “Any citizen who comes into possession of information or property they know they shouldn’t have has the civic obligation to return it immediately.”

The number of SSN involved is unclear, as Handy reports:

Wolosky said between 600 and 800 (the district says 200 to 300) of these were sent to him in the files, which is a violation. However, it is not clear if disclosure of employer identification numbers is also a violation.

Read more in the Sparta Independent.


Related:

  • Revealed: Afghan data breach after MoD official left laptop open on train
  • Snowflake Loses Two More Bids to Dismiss Data Breach Plaintiffs
  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • The 4TB time bomb: when EY's cloud went public (and what it taught us)
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
Category: Breach IncidentsEducation SectorExposureU.S.

Post navigation

← UK: ICO finds three councils in breach of Data Protection Act
Pirate Bay Hack Exposes User Booty →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.