DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Canada: Privacy an erroneous excuse for withholding HIV status

Posted on October 1, 2009 by Dissent

As a follow-up to a situation previously described here, there was an editorial in today’s Regina Leader-Post:

It qualifies as a “medical error” of sorts.

No, we’re not talking about a bungled procedure, but the refusal of health-care workers to tell a Saskatoon woman her boyfriend was HIV positive.

Frantic with worry after an immunodeficiency clinic at a hospital left a phone message saying they were looking for her boyfriend, the woman repeatedly called the clinic over several days to ask if she’d been exposed to HIV. She couldn’t ask the boyfriend — he’d suddenly disappeared.

Health-care workers wouldn’t answer any of the woman’s questions, until one finally said “that’s enough
of this nonsense” and revealed the truth. The woman got tested and discovered she also has HIV.

What health workers didn’t realize — right up to the level of a Saskatoon Health Region deputy medical health officer who fielded media questions about the case this week — is that the right to personal health privacy ends when someone else’s health might be jeopardized.

As Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner Gary Dickson made clear Wednesday (see his letter on this page), the legislation covering health privacy does allow for disclosure “to any person that may have been exposed to HIV”.

Read more in the Regina Leader-Post.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Canada: Two Brampton men charged in identity thefts
Hackers Breach Payroll Giant, Target Customers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt
  • Cybersecurity takes a big hit in new Trump executive order
  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January
  • Investigation of 2024 Helsinki data breach – Report
  • Major trial underway for data leak that left 72,000 victims in France
  • Anubis: A Closer Look at an Emerging Ransomware with Built-in Wiper
  • HealthEC Agrees to $5.48 Million Settlement to End Data Breach Lawsuit

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.