DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Stonewalled? Guttenberg housing residents still worried

Posted on November 28, 2010 by Dissent

Back in August, I reported a breach involving the Guttenberg Housing Authority in New Jersey that had reportedly left many housing residents and housing applicants on the waiting list confused and worried due to the lack of information in the notifications.  Three months later, Tricia Tirella of the Hudson Reporter reports that residents are still unable to get specific answers from GHA and that some have now gone to the police:

Originally, GHA officials declined to comment when the Reporter asked them questions about the incident. The Newark office of the federal department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which oversees the GHA, also declined to comment on the matter, releasing a statement that “It is HUD’s policy to refrain from commenting on matters in which litigation is pending or threatened to avoid prejudicing the position of the parties.”

It is unclear what the mention of “litigation” refers to.

This past Nov. 16, the Hudson Reporter asked GHA Executive Director Barbara Criscione if there was any progress in the investigation. The Reporter also requested public documents related to the investigation, citing the state’s Open Public Records Act. Among the information requested was any written correspondence to the police or other government authorities on the investigation.

Criscione responded last week by saying that she had no comment and that residents could directly contact the GHA office for additional questions. She said that the GHA was denying the OPRA request for documents related to the investigation because it was “overly broad and unclear.” She also denied the request for “written notification to police or other government authorities” because it “…is related to an ongoing investigation of this agency, and disclosure of such information would be adverse to the public interest.”

[…]

Several residents have now filed police complaints – and the police say the GHA has been equally unhelpful with them.

Read more in the Hudson Reporter.

DataBreaches.net has routinely called for transparency and adequately detailed notification letters. While some breaches are not disclosed promptly and fully due to active law enforcement investigations that might be compromised by disclosure, it is not clear whether this is one of those situations.  But how would you like to be in the residents’ shoes of not knowing what the heck happened?

In the meantime,  because the breach involved unauthorized access of SSN and financial data, I would encourage all people who are residents or who were on the waiting list for housing to assume that their data were taken for purposes of ID theft  and take the kinds of cautionary steps recommended by non-profit organizations like the Identity Theft Resource Center and Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. The Federal Trade Commission also provides free and helpful advice as to what to do in this type of situation.

Category: Breach IncidentsCommentaries and AnalysesGovernment SectorOf NoteU.S.Unauthorized Access

Post navigation

← Jp: ‘Leaked MPD data’ out as book
Texas sides with company seeking land records via USB →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.